Again, a two-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction effect (F(12, 96)=8.69, p<0.05).
Analysis with a two-way ANOVA revealed a significant interaction effect (F 16, 144)=7.56, p<0.05).
Meta-analysis across ADNI-GO/2 and ADNI-1 revealed a genome-wide significant interaction effect (P=1.1×10−8).
Furthermore, ANOVA found a significant interaction effect between the factors treatment and treatment night for rated fitness upon awakening (F 2,18)=6.6, P<0.05).
There was also a significant interaction effect of fertilizer and biochar on N2O emissions (P < 0.01).
The results showed no significant interaction effect between groups and time points.
Mood disturbance and social support had a significant interaction effect on symptom experience.
Furthermore, there was no significant interaction effect between perceptions of required effort and support availability.
There was a significant interaction effect of habitat and size on crocodile δ13C values.
We found a significant interaction effect of diagnostic group and dexamethasone treatment.
A significant interaction effect between the cross-flow velocity and pressure was observed.
