Suggestions(1)
Similar(59)
No significant influence of light-curing settings on the cytotoxicity was observed (p = 0.537 and 0.838 for pulp cells and gingival fibroblasts, respectively).
The primary hypothesis of the present study, that shortening the light-curing time while simultaneously increasing the light intensity results in a higher cytotoxicity of the surface sealants, has to be rejected as no significant influence of the light-curing settings on the cytotoxicity was observed, neither for the dental pulp cells nor for the gingival fibroblasts.
No significant influence of the light-curing setting (p = 0.537) on the cytotoxicity of the surface sealants was observed.
Since analysis indicated that there was no significant influence of time-of-day on baseline STAI levels or on anxiolytic responses to bright light, data were collapsed across all times of testing in the present report.
Although 2-way ANOVA showed a significant influence of the type of sealant on the cytotoxicity, no significant difference could be observed between the two sealants light-cured with the same light-curing setting (group 2 vs. 6: p = 0.995; 3 vs. 7: p = 1.000; 4 vs. 8: p = 0.507 and 5 vs. 9: p = 1.000).
Relevant literatures and experiments show that there is a significant influence of light dark cycles on microalgae yield.
Interestingly, there is no significant influence of F As.
'+' indicates a significant influence of the parameter on accuracy, '-' means no significant influence.
In addition, the light-scattering capacity of the photoanode has significant influence on the light-harvesting performance of the photoelectrode (photoanode sensitized by QDs).
The calcination temperature had a significant influence on the light magnesia and had no effect on its chemical composition.
This research claims that the stimulus of light had significant influence under most of the examined experimental conditions which is possibly related with its role in motivating production of ROS [108].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com