Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Significant differences were investigated by means of one way ANOVA with an ensuing Tukey HSD test.
Statistical significant differences were investigated at the level of p < 0.05 using Stata 10.2 software (Stata Corp., TX USA).
When considering the severe grades (grades III and IV) of morphological grading scale altogether, statistically significant differences were investigated between the sham group and both the without-LIPUS-treatment group (p < 0.01) and the with-LIPUS-treatment group (p = 0.04).
Similar(57)
Significant differences were further investigated using pairwise Mann–Whitney U tests between groups with Bonferroni correction.
Furthermore, no significant differences were identified between investigated groups in terms of diabetes duration and treatment or antihypertensive agents and statins (Table 1).
In T. viride, lipid accumulation after photoinduction has been investigated, and significant differences were found in sporulating, photoinduced, and nonsporulating, noninduced mycelia.
The seven angiogenesis-related factors (VEGF-A, VEGF/PlGF, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, Ang-1, Ang-2, and Tie-2) in 52 AML patients at presentation were investigated, and no significant differences were observed in the age and FAB subtypes (Table 1).
As expected, significant differences were found among the investigated countries.
No significant differences were observed in other items investigated.
A significant volume reduction of ~12 % was found in the ventral striatum of transgenic HD rats (p = 0.036), while no significant differences were seen in the regions investigated (Fig. 2).
The outcome of the three tests for dominancy (Table 2) was surprisingly consistent: for two subjects (1 and 8) the left leg was found to be the dominant leg, for the others clearly it was the right leg.> -wrap-foot> L and R, respectively, denote dominant Left or Right limb For none of the parameters investigated significant differences were found between days.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com