Sentence examples for significant differences were elicited from inspiring English sources

For subjective well-being (Fig. 3, bottom panel), significant differences were elicited by the r-ANOVA for the main factors "light condition" (F2,24 = 17.1, p<0.05), "session" (F9,35 = 31.8, p<0.001) and the interaction of factors "light condition" and "session" (F18,21 = 0.6, p = 0.04).

On the other hand, significant differences were elicited for the median RT (F4,11 = 9.3, p<0.05; Fig. 5 second panel) and 10% fastest RT (F4,11 = 10.7, p<0.05; Fig.5 third panel), such that light at 6500K induced significantly faster reaction times in comparison to light exposure at 2500K and 3000K.

When the neutralizing activity against clade C clinical isolates was examined, significant differences were seen among the sera elicited by different antigens.

No significant differences were found in the responses elicited by BoHV-1ΔgEβgal and BoHV-1 LA as inactivated antigens.

No significant differences were found in the responses elicited by BoHV-1ΔgEβgal versus BoHV-1 LA when administered as inactivated antigens, and none of the bovines belonging to the sentinel or mock-vaccinated groups showed positive reactions throughout the duration of the experiment.

Significant differences were found in the 5-HT doses eliciting roughly the same amount of contraction: migraine patients (examined in headache-free period) are more sensible (lower 5-HT dose) than controls (P < 0.001), migraine women are more sensible than migraine men (P < 0.001).

On the other hand, significant differences were found in the EMG signals, especially in the zygomaticus major, elicited by the calibration images.

No significant differences were observed.

In osteoblasts no significant differences were detectable.

Statistically significant differences were assumed when p<0.05.

Statistically significant differences were determined at P<0.05.