Exact(1)
Significant differences were assigned using Kruskal-Wallis post hoc test.
Similar(59)
Significant difference was assigned when P < 0.05.
No significant differences were identified between patients randomly assigned to the group 1 or 2 conditions with regard to basic demographic data including age and gender (Table 1).
No significant differences were identified between patients randomly assigned to the group A or B condition with regard to basic demographic data including age and gender (Table 1).
No significant differences were identified between patients randomly assigned to the group 1 or 2 conditions with regard to basic demographic data including age, gender and ethnicity (Table 1).
No significant differences were also found in biomarker levels between the four assigned treatment groups.
No significant differences were observed.
In osteoblasts no significant differences were detectable.
Statistically significant differences were assumed when p<0.05.
Statistically significant differences were determined at P<0.05.
Even without separating preparation quality into these two groups, significant differences are present in the categories assigned during the report between the morning and afternoon groups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com