Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was used to ensure.05 level of significance and to verify where the significant differences occurred.
In contrast, significant differences occurred with C10 mouse lung epithelial cells between the different conditions.
No significant differences occurred between the treatments (least significant difference test, α=0.05).
No significant differences occurred in vital signs recorded at final visit compared to those recorded at screening visit.
No differences existed between grass and maize composts (P < 0.05) but significant differences occurred due to varying proportions of straw in composts.
Results: Significant differences occurred between groups for forearm (P <.0001; repeated-measures analysis of variance) but not fingertip cutaneous blood flow.
Results indicated that significant differences occurred between outsole designs for the kinetic data, but all shoes impacted the ground at a similar orientation.
Significant differences occurred between fish passes in time to passage, and number of attempts to pass, with all but PW1 having significantly longer time to passage than the control culvert.
No significant differences occurred at 1-hour after operation or discharge, but more rescue analgesia was required in the placebo group ( P <.05), with more side effects ( P <.05).
With regard to wave action, no significant differences occurred in community structure, although there were indications of significant nutrient × wave effects for both the amount of exported red algae and the amount of accumulated brown algae.
Data smoothing did not affect CMRglc significantly, but significant differences occurred between estimates of all single rate constants with the original TAC and their estimates achieved with any combination of the smoothed data vectors (P < 0.05) with only one exception (comparison K 1 with smooth IF versus original data, see Figure 3A).
More suggestions(9)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com