**indicates significant differences compared with the control group (P < 0.01).
The tetrahedral algorithm has significant differences compared with the BCC or the FCC algorithms.
All ALA treatments (T1 T4) had significant differences compared with the no ALA treatment (CK2).
RMS misfits indicating significant differences compared with the inverted model are italicized.
Furthermore, samples from the most arid environments had significant differences compared with less arid soils.
The response was predominantly IgG2, with significant differences compared to control bulls (P < 0.05).
The design of this type of CAPRA/CADRA cores shows significant differences compared e.g. to conventional fast reactor cores.
In long-term test 1 (manually spiked sludge), the replicates containing NM-300K or silver nitrate showed statistically significant differences compared with the sludge control.
Focused MOH group and specially those poor responders to prophylactic treatment did not show any significant differences compared to other, mostly chronic, primary headache.
However, the RNAi lines showed no significant differences compared with Shengdao 806 for all tested traits (Additional file 7: Figure S5).
Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD) obtained from eight biological replicates (n = 8) and asterisks indicate statistically significant differences compared with ZH11 (Student's t-test, ** P < 0.01).
