Exact(1)
The significant difference was stated as mentioned above.
Similar(59)
Statistical significance was determined by Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and significant differences were stated for p < 0.05.
Apart from this, no significant differences were observed between the two groups at day 28.> -wrap-foot> > -wrap-foot> Relative differences are stated (significant if ≠ 1).
Relative differences are stated (significant if ≠ 1, marked with asterisk).
Differences are stated significant, based on the calculated 95% BCI.
Furthermore, no significant difference was observed for steady state levels of APP, BACE-1, ADAM-10 between the two groups of mice and after the dexamethasone challenge.
No significant difference was found in Rubisco activation state among Al and B combinations except for a slight decrease in the combinations of 10 μM B + 0 mM Al and 25 μM B + 1.2 mM Al (Fig. 4F).
In this study, a significant difference was determined in student's affective states in learning; based on Locus of control.
Cross-sectionally, no statistically significant difference was found in CRP distribution across mood states (p = 0.372) or rapid cycling state (p = 0.656).
A statistically significant difference was determined to exist when the physiologic state effect (comparison between all control samples against all lactating samples) yielded a p < 0.05 and the effect of lactation within a given tissue (physiologic state simple effect) yielded a p < 0.01.
Otherwise, significant difference was detected.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com