However, no significant difference was identified after Bonferroni correction for the three miRNAs differently expressed between malignant and benign groups.
However, similar to Djordjevic et al. [37], no statistically significant difference was identified in symmetrical subjects.
No significant difference was identified between the 2 groups in regard to radiographic or clinical parameters.
However, a significant difference was identified for the VAS (p = 0.042), indicating that the group that sought treatment on their own presented higher scores (median: 75.4) than the group referred to orthodontic treatment (median 68.6).
However, for the aesthetic and delicacy dimensions, no significant difference was identified between the two groups, showing consistency in their opinions on the aesthetic and structural features of these fashion pieces.
Statistically significant (p < 0.0001) differences in the RMS error values were found when comparing symmetrical with asymmetrical groups and a similarly significant difference was identified between the lower and the upper face of the asymmetrical group.
After stratification by compliance, a significant difference was identified among compliant patients in the treatment group (71% healed), noncompliant patients in the treatment group (50% healed), compliant patients in the placebo group (39% healed), and noncompliant patients in the placebo group (29% healed, linear-by-linear association = 4.32, p =.038).
However, no significant difference was identified between Groups P and H in terms of millimeter increments (p = 0.132).
However, when multiple patient samples were analyzed by qPCR no significant difference was identified (data not shown).
A significant difference was identified in OTU 1 and OTUs 4, 5, and 6 between CD and non-IBD patient groups (p<0.01) (Figure 1 marked with *).
In contrast, a significant difference was identified between the CCNM estimates and the estimates yielded by the Gehan and George [17] method for the fossil hominins (p = 0.02).
