Suggestions(5)
Exact(51)
No statistical significant difference was determined between ISQ values at all time points.
In this study, a significant difference was determined in student's affective states in learning; based on Locus of control.
A significant difference was determined, at a confidence level of 95%, between the influence of the three profiles on alfalfa dehydration and protein extraction in the raw filtrate.
The significant difference was determined by the paired t test and Pearson's correlation coefficient to examine the relationship between these two parameters.
After the teaching was accomplished by the same teacher in both groups, a significant difference was determined between the groups according to the post-test results and this difference was associated with the teacher's sense of learning.
At the end of the study a significant difference was determined in favor of post-test scores between pre-test and post-test scores of the attitude of elementary education students towards the science course.
Similar(9)
The source of significant differences was determined by post hoc comparison.
Directionality of statistically significant differences was determined using Tukey-Kramer pairwise testing or non-parametric pairwise methods as appropriate.
Significant differences were determined using ANOVA or Tukey, with significance assumed at P<0.05.
Statistically significant differences were determined by a Student t-test using significance levels of 0.01 and 0.05.
Significant differences were determined by two-way ANOVA.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com