significant deficit of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "significant deficit of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a notable lack or shortfall of something, often in contexts related to finance, health, or resources. Example: "The organization is facing a significant deficit of funds, which may impact its ability to operate effectively."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Also, the companies with a significant deficit of funding increase their levels of debt.

Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research

We confirm in a blinded analysis of raw signals that migraineurs present interictally a significant deficit of VEP habituation, similarly to non-blinded analysis of the same traces.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

Although the overall small-world characteristics were observed at both baseline and follow-up, a scan-point independent significant deficit of global integration was found in patients compared to controls, suggesting dysfunctional integration of the brain and supporting the notion of schizophrenia as a disconnection syndrome.

Schizophrenia Research

In the second generation, eleven lines showed a significant deficit of heterozygotes (mean I  = 0.27±0.050; Figure 2b).

Plosone

In the third generation, four lines showed a significant deficit of heterozygotes, while two lines showed a significant excess of heterozygotes (mean I  = −0.02±0.043; Figure 2c).

Plosone

In the fourth generation one line showed a significant deficit of heterozygotes, and eleven lines showed a significant excess of heterozygotes (mean I  = −0.24±0.071; Figure 2d).

Plosone

A significant deficit of 3LMS heterozygotes was detected in all samples (P<0.001), with the exception of that collected in Guinea Bissau in 1995.

Plosone

Second, in our study, most populations displayed significant deficit of heterozygotes at several loci and significant monolocus FIS estimates were widely distributed across loci.

Plosone

Like in humans, we observe a significant deficit of PS genes on the sex chromosomes (χ2 = 117.1, df = 19, p<0.001, Figure S7 A), with a striking absence of PS genes on the Y chromosome.

Plosone

On the other hand, we find a slightly significant deficit of PS genes on the Y chromosome (p = 0.015 when controlled for anatomical systems, and p = 0.05 when controlled for cell types).

Plosone

It was immediately observed that the disease dataset contained four loci (pr4.3, pr4.1, ldox-c and set-like-c) that were strongly conserved (i.e. they had a highly significant deficit of amino acid replacements) and were poorly modeled as a single group together with the other disease candidates.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "significant deficit of", quantify the deficit if possible to provide a clearer understanding of the magnitude of the shortfall. For example, specify "a significant deficit of 20%" rather than just "a significant deficit".

Common error

Avoid using "significant deficit of" when the deficit is minor or inconsequential. Ensure the deficit genuinely impacts the situation being described, to keep the phrase's impact accurate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "significant deficit of" functions as a descriptive term, typically acting as part of a noun phrase. It modifies a noun to indicate a noteworthy lack or shortage, as supported by examples in Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "significant deficit of" is a grammatically correct phrase used to describe a noteworthy lack or shortage, as confirmed by Ludwig. It is most commonly found in scientific and formal contexts. When using this phrase, consider quantifying the deficit for clarity and avoiding its use for minor shortfalls. Alternatives include "substantial lack of" or "considerable shortage of". While widely accepted, ensure the term aligns with the context and intended impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

substantial lack of

This alternative emphasizes the size or amount of the deficiency, similar to "significant deficit of".

considerable shortage of

Focuses on the insufficiency of something needed, implying a practical problem due to the lack.

marked deficiency in

Highlights a notable absence or inadequacy, often used in technical or formal contexts.

pronounced scarcity of

This phrase suggests that something is rare or hard to find, making the lack more prominent.

major shortfall in

Focuses on failing to reach a required or expected level, indicating a practical problem.

acute paucity of

Emphasizes the limited quantity of something, often used in formal or academic writing.

notable absence of

Highlights the complete lack of something, often in contexts where its presence would be expected.

serious inadequacy of

Emphasizes the insufficient nature of something, often implying negative consequences.

critical undersupply of

Highlights that the lack is so problematic because it is considered critical.

severe depletion of

Suggests that something has been used up or reduced significantly, leading to a severe lack.

FAQs

How can I use "significant deficit of" in a sentence?

You can use "significant deficit of" to describe a notable lack or shortage. For instance, "The study revealed a significant deficit of vitamin D in the population" or "The company is facing a significant deficit of funds".

What are some alternatives to "significant deficit of"?

Alternatives include "substantial lack of", "considerable shortage of", or "marked deficiency in". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it redundant to say "very significant deficit of"?

While not grammatically incorrect, "very significant deficit of" can be redundant. The word "significant" already implies importance. Consider using a stronger alternative like "critical undersupply of" if you want to emphasize the severity.

What's the difference between "deficit of" and "shortage of"?

"Deficit of" generally implies a numerical or measurable deficiency, while "shortage of" implies an insufficient quantity to meet a need or demand. While they can overlap, "deficit" is often used in more formal or technical contexts than "shortage".