significant contributors

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "significant contributors" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to individuals or entities that have made important contributions to a project, cause, or field of study. Example: "The research paper acknowledged the significant contributors who helped shape the findings and conclusions."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

"There are many more significant contributors.

The Guardian

Even though they acknowledge they are significant contributors.

The Guardian

The standard industry guidelines for medical journals require the authors to identify all significant contributors.

The New York Times

As a consequence, Greenland is one of the significant contributors to sea level rise.

The Guardian

Among scholars there is little disagreement about who have been its most significant contributors.

The Guardian

Suicide, drug use and risky levels of smoking and alcohol consumption are also significant contributors.

The Guardian

It helped them move into the heart of American life as significant contributors and, for some, as shining lights.

The New York Times

Also overlooked, they say, is the methane gas and carbon dioxide produced by decomposing vegetation, significant contributors to global warming.

The New York Times

Eight of today's 11 starters for the United States were significant contributors on the celebrated World Cup championship team last July.

The New York Times - Sports

Besides O'Donovan, significant contributors in the early years of the service included Philip Toynbee, Colin Legum, Nora Beloff, Lejos Lederer, Edward Crankshaw and Robert Stephens.

The Guardian

Instead, the cuts take aim at companies, communities and small landholders who want to invest in a medium array and become significant contributors to the grid.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "significant contributors", be specific about the nature of their contributions to provide context and clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "significant contributors" as a generic term without detailing the specific contributions made. Always provide concrete examples or descriptions to support the claim.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "significant contributors" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It identifies individuals or entities that have made important contributions. As per Ludwig AI, this is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Encyclopedias

4%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "significant contributors" is a versatile and commonly used noun phrase to describe individuals or entities that have made noteworthy contributions to a particular field, project, or cause. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and widely applicable. Its use spans across various contexts, including scientific research, news reporting, and formal business settings. When employing this phrase, it's crucial to provide specific context about the nature of the contributions to avoid vagueness. Alternatives such as "major players" or "key figures" can be used depending on the desired nuance. By considering these guidelines, writers can effectively and accurately highlight the importance of contributions in their writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

major players

This alternative emphasizes the importance and influence of the contributors.

key figures

This alternative highlights the individual people who made notable contributions.

leading participants

This alternative emphasizes the active role and prominence of the contributors.

notable individuals

This alternative focuses on the importance and recognition of the individual contributors.

prominent members

This alternative emphasizes the visibility and importance of the contributors within a group or organization.

substantial benefactors

This alternative highlights the financial support or resources provided by the contributors.

primary drivers

This alternative focuses on the contributors as the main force behind an achievement or project.

instrumental forces

This alternative emphasizes the essential role of the contributors in achieving a particular outcome.

central architects

This alternative refers to the contributors as the creators or designers of a plan or system.

influential agents

This alternative emphasizes the impact and persuasive power of the contributors.

FAQs

How can I use "significant contributors" in a sentence?

You can use "significant contributors" to highlight individuals or entities that have played a crucial role in a particular achievement, field, or project. For example, "The research team acknowledged the significant contributors to the study."

What are some alternatives to saying "significant contributors"?

You can use alternatives like "major players", "key figures", or "leading participants" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "major contributors" or "significant contributors"?

Both "major contributors" and "significant contributors" are acceptable. The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey. "Major" emphasizes the scale of contribution, while "significant" highlights the importance or impact.

What is the difference between "significant contributors" and "key players"?

"Significant contributors" emphasizes the act of contributing and its importance, while "key players" highlights the individuals or groups involved and their influence within a specific domain or project.