Phonological memory explained a modest, but significant, amount of variance in comprehension of the unpointed script alone.
PF muscle strength (concentric peak torque) explained a significant amount of variance in all gait variables (20 37%).
Finally, attitudes toward technology and distance perceptions explained a significant or marginally significant amount of variance in the effectiveness measures after controlling for technology self-efficacy, reliability, and effective use.
Furthermore, Chinese tone processing skill contributed a moderate but significant amount of variance in predicting English pseudoword reading even when English phonemic-level processing skill was taken into consideration.
Addition of stoichiometric measures and other soil attributes (e.g. soil C N, C P, δ15N) in a multiple regression model explained more of the variation than a single factor plus the land use effect (though soil order still explained a small, but significant amount of variance for measures of microbial biomass).
However, ToM at ages 2 and 3 did not explain a significant amount of variance in EF at age 4. Bootstrap procedures revealed that verbal ability at age 3 fully mediated the relation between ToM at age 2 and EF at age 4.
The Diverting Attention and Praying factor of the CSQ explained a moderate (9%), but significant amount of variance in pain report.
Despite not being predictive of gender, the bottom three factors capture a significant amount of variance in the data.
The 5th pain rating in a series of suprathreshold heat pain stimuli accounted for a significant amount of variance in clinical pain intensity, with no other QST measure contributing to the model.
Again, the predictors explained a significant amount of variance in the criterion variable, F 3, 206) = 13.41, p < .001, R 2 = .163.163
The predictor variables explained a significant amount of variance of the criterion variable, F 3, 296) = 19.84, p < .001, R 2 = .167.167
