At this point, we do not consider the per-SALI significance values for landscapes that are identified as non-significant.
ns, not significant, * P <0.05, ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001, significance values for comparison with previous group.
Significance values for pairwise comparisons between all groups are shown in Table 1.
The size and significance values for the various Spearman rank-order correlations are shown in Table 3.
Tables S1 and S2: Student t-test significance values for pair wise comparison of target prediction performance of all the fingerprints used in PPB.
Table 5 Spearman's (rho) and significance values for correlation analysis between select emotion ratings and self-reported computer proficiency for for "users" and "non-users" Emotion Users Emotion Non-users (rho) Sig.
Finally, based on the results of Levene's test the top rows in the t-test for Equality of Means indicate the significance values for all cases is greater than 0.05.
Tables 6 and 7 display a number of parameters: mean value, standard deviation, standard error and significance values for the pairs of the best F-measure and QPI values of clustering methods which are ((CVAA, Ward's method), (CVAA, CSPA) and (CVAA, HGPA)) compared in the paired samples t-test procedure.
To compute significance values for consecutive points in time, we performed an unpaired two tailed Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney tests.
Significance values for comparing pharmacological manipulations to control were generated using the Students paired t-test, significance was considered to be p<0.05.
Significance values for voxel and cluster level inferences were computed based on the quantiles of the permutation distribution of the maximal t and of the largest cluster of contiguous suprathreshold voxels, respectively [76].
