Suggestions(5)
Exact(2)
Although a close to significance, multivariate analysis did not support the significant difference found either for the ototoxic exposure (P = 0.06) in univariate analysis, or for the distance between each electrode and the inner wall of the cochlea (P = 0.13) (Table 1).
This remains of borderline significance (multivariate B=0.01, f(1,88) 3.77, P=0.06) when controlled for cancer type, age, education and general anxiety.
Similar(58)
Some other risk factors that were significant in univariate analyses lost significance in multivariate analyses.
Serum vitamin D, which was borderline significant in univariate analysis, lost its significance in multivariate analysis.
Aspergillosis was found to be a significant predictor of death in univariate analysis and almost reached significance in multivariate analysis.
Age retained statistical significance at multivariate analysis (p = 0.03, OR 1.07).
All factors except tumor site maintained their significance in multivariate testing.
The background data and the experimental data were compared, and differences between the datasets were tested for significance using multivariate analysis at the 0.001 significance level.
However, these associations failed to reach significance in multivariate analysis.
Significance in multivariate models was determined using the likelihood ratio test.
The prognostic profile maintained independent prognostic significance in multivariate analysis when correcting for debulking status and the response to therapy.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com