Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
The significance group was extracted from the top 5% of significant p-values of differential expression.
For reaction times to misses both main effects did not reach significance (Group: F 1,30) = 2.37, ns; Learning Mode: F 1,30) = 3.25, ns) but we found a significant interaction (Group x Learning Mode: F 1,30) = 4.71, p<.05).
This iterative process continues until failure to reach a significance group difference at p < 0.01 for any candidate cutoff value.
Other analysis parameters include: GO level intervals: (3 15); number of associated proteins for cluster 1: (nine); number of associated proteins for cluster 2: (one); OR 50% specific; GO Term Fusion Leading Groupp: Highest Significance; Group Merge: (50%).
Fluoroscopy time was 16 ± 14.4 minutes for all patients, 19.8 ± 17.4 minutes for patients of group 1, 18.4 ± 14.9 minutes for patients of group 2, and 15.2 ± 13.2 minutes for patients of group 4. No differences showed statistical significance (group 1 versus group 2, P = 0.865; group 1 versus group 4, P = 0.716; group 2 versus 4 group, P = 0.787).
A further group effect which approached significance (group × CTI in PRB error rates) suggests that the above described group switching differences (both group effects were interactions with the CTI factor) may be attributable to a general ADHD group deficiency in task preparation mechanisms.
Similar(52)
When "Time x Group" interactions reached the level of significance, group-specific post hoc tests (i.e., paired t-tests) were conducted to identify the comparisons that were statistically significant.
As mentioned above, all the data should be analysed together for significance groups.
The LSD post-hoc test was performed to discriminate significance groups.
In the case of statistical significance, groups were tested by independent sample t-test to determine which difference was significant.
It's especially difficult to understand the comparisons made in 3E and Figure 5.These data should all be analysed together and grouped into significance groups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com