Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The calculated root-mean-square (RMS) error between mean grain sizes obtained from the proposed image processing method and the sieve method (for the 64 samples) was 0.33 mm, and for the image processing method versus manual point counts comparison, with the same images, was 0.12 mm.
Similar(59)
As discussed before, the sieve method is not suitable for analyzing the particle size distribution in the respirable range.
A potential advantage of the SIEVE method is that all frames can be analyzed for a peptide, provided that at least one frame has an annotated peptide.
In a previous study, the present method for masticatory efficiency was validated and found to be comparable to a sieve method [40].
It can be obtained from the experimental data of sieve method.
The particle size distributions for sand samples were firstly obtained by sieving method.
The various methods for assessment of masticatory function include food particle size estimation [15], sieving method [16], colorimetric determination [17], optical scanning method [18], biting force [15], and weight loss of viscoelastic food [19].
The field-moist aggregate size classes were separated by a gentle dry-sieving method.
Particle size distribution of ruminal digesta and feces was measured by wet sieving method.
Soil aggregate stability test was conducted by wet sieving method as outlined in USDA-NRCS (2014).
Separation of water-stable aggregates was conducted by a wet sieving method [28].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com