Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Louis occasionally joined his brother in his work, but it was the purely conceptual side of physics that attracted him.
In an interview with Science, Thorne talks about his vision for a movie built around the "warped side" of physics, figuring out what could go wrong with Earth, the wonder of special effects, and the material strength of ice.
It is, finally, reasonably clear where Lewis's sympathies lie, with respect to this conflict (and even if he was not properly aware of their significance): on the side of physics.
How superior this way of thinking was, compared to Isaac Newton's declaration that he would "not define Time, Space, Place or Motion, as being well known to all" (quoted in Bridgman 1927, 4)! Bridgman felt that all physicists, including himself, had been guilty of unthinking extensions of concepts, especially on the theoretical side of physics.
Similar(56)
Plainly, Hawking can appreciate the ironies implicit in the speculative side of quantum physics.
On the other side, the Physics of foams have been comprehensively revised in a recent book [12] and reviewed in current works appearing in the literature [13], [14].
The physics side of this picture is open to debate, and partisans on both sides have been going at it for quite some time.
The author of "The Mind-Body Problem" explores the darker side of the conflict of ideas in physics between relativity and quantum mechanics, both of which find expression in the structure of the novel itself.
Opposing these inductive-empiricist scientists were those whose roots were mostly in the theoretical side of natural science, most especially mathematical physics.
With the play Ubu Roi and novels like Exploits & Opinions of Doctor Faustroll Pataphyscian, the diminutive, anarchic writer sketched the absurdist details of pataphysics, "the science of imaginary solutions"—an anti-philosophy that was the dark side of the moon to metaphysics and physics.
The cold narrative of physics.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com