side effects of

USAGE SUMMARY

'side effects of' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to the possible negative effects of an action or event. For example: "The side effects of taking this medication can include nausea and dizziness."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

The side effects of that are obvious.

The New York Times

-What are the side effects of steroids?

The New York Times

What are the costs, and the side effects, of bliss?

The New York Times - Books

The inflammation is exacerbated by side effects of the medicines.

The New Yorker

The side effects of the drug are no fun.

The New York Times

Some dislike the side effects of the anti-retrovirals.

The New York Times

"The side effects of radiation were mild," he said.

The New York Times - Health

Does this patient know about the side effects of Effexor?

The New York Times - Books

The most alarming side effects of chemotherapy are invisible.

The Guardian - Opinion

For many patients, the side effects of Zyprexa are severe.

The New York Times

They are the complicated side effects of a simple decision.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing medical treatments or interventions, clearly specify both the intended benefits and the "side effects of" the treatment to provide a balanced perspective.

Common error

Avoid minimizing or dismissing the potential seriousness of "side effects of" a treatment or action. Always provide accurate and complete information to ensure informed decision-making.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "side effects of" functions as a prepositional phrase typically modifying a noun or noun phrase. It indicates the consequences or unintended results that arise from a particular action, treatment, or condition. Ludwig AI shows this is used in varied contexts, from medicine to economics.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

53%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "side effects of" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to describe unintended consequences arising from a particular action or event. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is frequently used in scientific, medical, and news-related contexts. While highly versatile, consider alternatives like "adverse reactions" or "unintended consequences" for more precise communication. Remember to avoid minimizing the seriousness of the side effects when discussing treatments or interventions, and always provide complete and accurate information.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

detrimental effects of

Specifically indicates harmful or damaging effects.

adverse reactions to

Focuses specifically on negative reactions, often in a medical context.

unintended consequences of

Highlights consequences that were not initially planned or expected.

secondary impacts of

Emphasizes that these impacts are not the primary or direct result.

downside of

A more general term for the disadvantages or negative aspects.

drawbacks of

Similar to "downside of", indicating negative aspects or limitations.

repercussions of

Highlights the far-reaching or significant consequences of an action.

aftermath of

Focuses on the period and consequences following an event.

collateral damage from

Suggests unintended harm or negative effects resulting from an action.

negative externalities of

Refers to costs or consequences that are not reflected in the price of a good or service.

FAQs

How can I use "side effects of" in a sentence?

Use "side effects of" to describe the unintended or unwanted consequences resulting from a particular action, treatment, or event. For example, "The "side effects of the drug" included nausea and dizziness".

What are some alternatives to "side effects of"?

Alternatives include "adverse reactions to", "unintended consequences of", or "drawbacks of", depending on the context.

Is it appropriate to use "side effects of" in formal writing?

Yes, "side effects of" is appropriate for formal writing, especially when discussing medical, scientific, or policy-related topics. However, consider using more precise language like "adverse reactions" or "unintended consequences" for enhanced clarity.

What is the difference between "side effects of" and "direct effects of"?

"Side effects of" refer to unintended consequences, while "direct effects of" refer to the intended or immediate results. For example, the direct effect of a painkiller is to relieve pain, while the "side effects of painkillers" might include drowsiness.