Sentence examples for sickness ratios from inspiring English sources
At study outset, both areas exhibited high scores on the major deprivation indices including Oxford, Breadline Britain, Townsend, Jarman and Carstairs and with elevated Standard Mortality Rates, Standard Long Term Illness and permanent sickness ratios.
13 The four remaining studies indicated reductions in the risk of acute mountain sickness, with odds ratios of 0.46 (0.19 to 1.13), 23 0.20 (0.01 to 2.91), 29 0.29 (0.08 to 1.06), 24 and 0.50 (0.23 to 1.10), 27 (see fig 2), but the 95% confidence intervals for these studies crossed the line of no effect.
A longitudinal study of 24,036 employees in Sweden [ 7] showed that those who had been repeatedly exposed to large expansions (increases in staffing) during 1991-1996 han an excess risk of both long-term sickness absence (odds ratio 1.07 [95% CI 1.01-1.13]) and hospital admission (1.09 [1.02-1.16]) during 1997-1999.
The log odds ratio for decompression sickness = 1.40 (decrease in grip score).
The odds ratio (OR) for sickness absence increased for most groups over time.
However, this did not change the above statistically significant results regarding the risk ratio of future sickness absence.
The risk ratio (RR) for sickness absence at 18 months increased for the ID and DYS patient groups in comparison to the AC patient group 95% confidence interval (CI) in parenthesis; RR = 2.086, p = 0.032 (CI: 1.065 to 4.085) for ID, and RR = 3.278, p < 0.001 (CI: 1.715 to 6.266) for DYS.
Hazard ratios were higher for sickness absences attributed to circulatory disease (4.7) and surgical operations (2.2).
We used Cox regression to calculate covariance adjusted hazard ratios for long-term sickness absence for both measures.
Table 3 presents the risk differences and odds ratios for long-term sickness or disability for high school dropouts compared to high school completers for each stratum of the propensity score.
DYS also had a threefold increase in the risk ratio of long-term sickness absence at 18 months.
