Sentence examples for shrinkage was calculated from inspiring English sources

From the bulk densities, the shrinkage was calculated.

Tumor shrinkage was calculated as the percent change in size from baseline of the target lesion to the smallest post-baseline measurement.

Eta and epsilon shrinkage was calculated to assess the reliability of diagnostic plots, individual parameter estimates and post hoc parameter estimates [ 23].

The linear polymerization shrinkage was calculated using [ 8]: (1) lin ⁡ % = [ Δ L L + Δ L ] × 100, where Δ L is the recorded displacement and L is the thickness of the specimen after polymerization.

Parameter shrinkage was calculated as [1 - sd/ω], where sd and ω are the standard deviation of individual η parameters and the population model estimate of the BSV, respectively.

The samples' shrinkage was calculated at specific temperatures from the variation of the samples' area, using (1), which assumes isotropic shrinkage [ 32]: (1) Shrinkage = A 0 − A T A 0 × 100, where A0 = the initial area of the specimen at room temperature, and A T = the area of the specimen at temperature T = 900°C.

The neck growth and shrinkage were calculated during these sintering simulations, making it possible to extend these results to the evolution of global physical properties that occurs during sintering.

η and ε shrinkage were calculated in nonmem.

The η-shrinkage was calculated for each scenario and the values are presented in Table  I (column 5).

The shrinkage ratio was calculated using the following equation: {text{Shrinkage}};{text{ratio}}; = ;;left[ {1 - left( {frac{ab}{{a_{text{o}} b_{text{o}} }}} right)} right];; times ;;100,where A = length of dry membrane (m), b = breadth of dry membrane (m), a o = length of wet membrane (m), b o = breadth of wet membrane (m).

Dimensional changes (shrinkage%) was calculated from the difference in fabric length before and after treatment according to AATCC test method 96 (2009).