The results showed that the programme was significant on the self-awareness, automatic thoughts, and emotion regulation.
Iran's state-run TV reported yesterday that Mr Ahmadinejad had ordered nuclear facilities to be opened up to foreign tourists to show that the programme is peaceful.
In New York, all the indicators seem to show that the programme is meeting its professed aims: to save money and reduce rates of hospitalisation.
Figures published last November showed that the programme got off to a slow start in its first 14 months, with only 3.2 per cent of those entering keeping jobs.
Instead, the latest estimates show that the programme will cost £121m and save just £40m, leaving taxpayers with a bill of £81m.
Perhaps a comparison with the views of other non-Muslim first generation migrants and, or rural communities would have been helpful in order to show that the programme wasn't just targeting one religion.
From a performance point of view, the paper shows that the programme has been well received by rural communities, and carbon payments have contributed to increase household income and to enhance forest management practices and organisational skills.
But when the military government that started it gave way to a civilian one, it went to great lengths, in co-operation with its neighbour and one-time nuclear rival, Argentina, to show that the programme had been dismantled.
This, or so the Kurds and others argue, shows that the programme can work perfectly well when it is administered by the UN, as it is in the north.
The results show that the programme, with the learning units designed as below (including workshops, individual consulting, working visits, interactive learning), enables the education and training of project managers, facilitates the implementation of long term CP activities, and helps to reduce wastes and emissions significantly.
