The difference between observed and expected task neglect is shown as a function of group size.
The PSF is shown as a function of depth and position on the sensor.
The ideal Otto cycle efficiency is shown as a function of the compression ratio in Figure 3.11.
In Figure 8.24 similar resolution curves are shown as a function of the source off-axis angle.
Results of these parameters are shown as a function of mQa for various improved gauge actions.
(C) The success of PCD+ strains versus a PCD− competitor are shown as a function of PCD rate c and the assortment parameter r.
The effect on the resolving power (E/∆E) is shown as a function of photon energy for off-axis angles of 0′, 1′, 5′, 10′, and 20′.
The effect on the apparent resolving power (E/∆E) is shown as a function of photon energy for source sizes of 0′′,0.5′′, 1′′,2′′, 5′′, and 10′′.
Finally, the η effect for Coefficient of Performance (COP) is shown as a function of absorber temperature.
Percentage distribution of the complex species present in the system is shown as a function of log/ligand concentration.
From top to bottom, temperature, density and pressure profiles are shown as a function of longitude cutting through the northern and southern chimneys at latitudes b ≈ 0.7° and b ≈ −1.2° (see Extended Data Fig. 6).
