Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
And he showed "Rules for Men" at film festivals, including the Atlantic City Film Festival, where it won best comedy in 1999.
Similar(58)
As stated previously, none of the rats showed rule-based generalization, while 26 out of 48 human participants did.
In summary, all pigeons in Experiment 2A showed feature-based generalization, while the majority of humans in Experiment 2B showed rule-based generalization.
Table 2 shows rules generated from randomForest models by using the inTrees package.
That seems to be a pretty strong constraint, and in fact a detailed analysis of the data (not shown) rules it out.
Humans show rule-based generalization in the criterial-attribute procedure, while feature-based responding was observed in macaques (Couchman et al. 2010).
On a Chi-square contingency test, the human participants were significantly more likely to show rule-based generalization than the rats, χ(1) = 20.35, p < 0.01.
Yet, while rats and pigeons did not seem to extract rules in the current procedure, it cannot be excluded that those animals would show rule-based behavior under different circumstances.
A valid reason for assuming that rats, and by extension pigeons, might show rule-based behavior in other tasks is the observation that rats are capable of generalizing sequential rules (see " Introduction" section; Murphy et al. 2008).
The following real-life scenario illustrates the way we apply the SWRL rules shown in Rule-Set-1.
They further showed how rules and different kinds of churn are related.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com