Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(28)
The average deviation between the ILPM-CFD results and the experimental and CFD data is less than 0.75%, whereas constant efficiency models showed a deviation up to 30%.
This showed a deviation from the simulated braid angle of 3 degrees in the centered, non-tapered mandrel regions, up to 10 degrees in tapered regions and an experimental scatter of 7 degrees.
The dramatic decrease in the partition coefficient (Hvoc,mixture) with oil addition clearly showed a deviation from linearity, which was more pronounced for increasing Hvoc,water/Hvoc,solvent ratios.
Metric analyses of the deviation between the virtual points and clips showed a deviation of 2.3 ± 0.6 mm for tumours with a maxilla localization, 7.2 ± 2.5 mm for tumours with a mandible localization, and 12.6 ± 3.8 mm for tumours with a tongue localization.
However, the probability of displacement, i.e. the propagator, was skewed towards slower velocities and long tails at high displacements for the micelle solution and incorporation of a fractional dynamics approach using the moments of the probability distribution showed a deviation from asymptotic Gaussian statistics.
Analysis with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) showed a deviation in heat capacity, ΔCp, with clay content at the Tg from a two-phase trend which was attributed to the formation of an immobilized rigid amorphous fraction (RAF) in the interlayer spacing of the intercalated system.
Similar(32)
The results show a deviation from ionization equilibrium.
Comparative measurements have shown a deviation between the recorded and the actual precipitation intensity.
Early in the 1970s an experiment by the American physicist Daniel R. Long seemed to show a deviation from the inverse square law at a range of about 0.1 metre.
This first attempt to validate the model was satisfactory, showing a deviation of 6% (35 °C) between experimental and numerical values.
About 63% of these catchments show a deviation between modelled and observed loads of 30% and more.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com