Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(9)
We show via simulations using realistic workloads and topologies that this simple design achieves near op- timal flow completion times and network utilization.
We show via simulations that this enables light rays to reach more than 99.9% of the surface of objects placed inside the trap, even those with strong occlusions, for example, lattice-shaped objects.
Without the previous knowledge of the plant parameters neither its model, we show via simulations the good performance of both strategies.
While this makes it difficult to evaluate the performance of greedy algorithms for sensor selection (outside of certain special cases), we show via simulations that these greedy algorithms perform well in practice.
We show via simulations that the proposed approach can be used in conjunction with the existing filter-based methods to achieve a substantially better ranking of a gene relevant for disease when compared to currently used filter-based approaches, this is especially so in the presence of disease locus heterogeneity.
We will show via simulations that EMBSBL is not sensitive to the choice of h.
Similar(50)
We theoretically bound the expected time until coalescence for the composite algorithm, and show via simulation that the theoretical bounds can be close to actual performance.
We show, via simulation, that our method can reduce the control cost compared to the state-of-art methods.
We show via simulation and counterexamples that the Mantel–Haenszel estimator of a common odds ratio, adapted for complex survey designs using survey weights, is inconsistent for sparse-data limiting models.
We show via simulation that the correct calculation of marginal risks from a random intercepts model results in predictions with excellent calibration.
Although the D T threshold of 0.01 is arbitrary, Oaks et al. [ 7] did show via simulation that the true value of D T will almost always be greater than 0.01 when divergences are random over periods of 0.1 coalescent units or more (see Figure Sfour of [ 7]).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com