The phrase "show the worst performance" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to refer to a poor job, effort, or achievement. For example, "The team showed the worst performance this season, losing four out of five matches."
In contrast to the HDR metrics, the NR metrics show the worst performance with PLCC and SROCC values below 0.5 and RMSE and OR values above 1 and 0.8, respectively, independently of the domain in which the metric was computed.
This experiment was conducted with [12], which is a science fiction, action movie with the lowest level of similarity among frames; this experimental environment can show the worst performance of the proposed method, while the method under [2] with which the proposed method was compared was a case of best performance with an estimation error of 0%.
Not surprisingly, all the metrics considered show the worst performance also with respect the basic scenario.
Expectedly, the HapMap SNPs for African population show the worst performance with coverage of approximately 30% only.
On the contrary, the IQE shows that this group of cells performs relatively more efficiently and suggests two trends: 1. that devices with much thicker or, surprisingly, much thinner Cu2O layers relative to the TiO2 layer, actually perform better, and 2. intermediate thickness ratios show the worst performances.
The adaptive scheme shows the worst performance, and the fixed scheme performs slightly better than QDRA.
The EM-based algorithm shows the worst performance in CFO estimation among all, but it performs better than JML-CFE in CIR estimation.
The SA algorithm showed the worst performance.
ACO shows the worst performance among the three algorithms.
MFCC shows the worst performance in all conditions.
The GCC-PHAT shows the worst performance in noisy environment.
