Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The study is powered to show a standardised mean difference of 0.3 in the primary outcome, pain-related disability.
Similar(59)
The blue curve depicted in Fig. 9 shows a standardised run time, expressing how run time would evolve for 1,000 GIMME positives.
23 The finding of a prevalence estimate of advanced colorectal neoplasia (the precursor to colorectal cancer) in this study of 13% (that is, approximately twice the prevalence in the general population) is consistent with other studies showing a standardised incidence ratio of colorectal cancer of approximately two to three in transplant recipients.
DPICS scores were combined using a random effects model and the combined data (see Figure 4) show a significant standardised mean difference favouring the intervention group of SMD -0.44 (95% CI: -0.66, -0.23).
The results were combined using a random effects model, and the combined results (see Figures 2 and 3) show a significant standardised mean difference favouring the intervention group of -0.67 (95% CI: -0.91, -0.42).
This study confirms the presence of multiple cardiovascular risk factors in patients with COPD undergoing multi-disciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation, and is the first to show that a standardised programme appears to improve the cardiovascular risk profile.
Figure 3b shows a 50% standardised difference effect when the SD is 6 points (3-point effect).
Previous investigations offer a possible biological rationale for this observation, although clinical studies following patients with AS have actually shown a reduced standardised mortality ratio in patients with AS [ 21].
Uptake is shown as a standardised uptake value (SUV).
Here we have shown that a standardised approach to analysing PD-related microarray data can account for a considerable proportion of the discordance.
We have previously shown that a standardised, concentrated neonatal parenteral nutrition regimen can optimise macronutrient intake.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com