Although PP6R1 was expressed at a lower level than PP6R2 and PP6R3 in the quadruple sap mutant, it showed a robust interaction with Sit4, and was not out-competed by Sap155 in the sap185 and sap190 double mutant (Figure 2).
MIEF1 shows a robust interaction with hFis1, in contrast to a much weaker interaction observed between hFis1 and Drp1.
Particularly, P509S showed a robust interaction with all J-proteins (hTid-1S, hTid-1L, DnaJC19) and as a result significantly imparting the folding phenotype.
However, deletion constructs lacking the N-terminal DVL1 DIX domain (DVL1ΔDIX) showed a robust interaction with the Roc-COR bait, equivalent to DVL2 or DVL3 (Fig. 1A).
Although Ku70 showed a robust interaction with Rap1, in contrast to the effect on TRF2 interaction, mutations in Ku70 α5 did not impact the Ku70-Rap1 PCA, further arguing for the specificity of the influence of Ku70 α5 on the Ku70-TRF2 interaction.
A between-groups ANOVA analysis of RTs to Combat and Matched-neutral blocks showed a robust interaction of Valence x Group, F 2,87)=8.53, p=.0004, indicating that although all groups were slower on Combat words, PTs had greater slowing than either control group.
We show a robust physical interaction between PARP1 and the replication fork protein TIMELESS, distinct from the known TIMELESS-TIPIN complex, which activates the intra-S phase checkpoint.
Recently, an inducible protein-RNA-based interaction system was reported where the authors show a robust 80% reduction in protein expression (Goldfless et al., 2014).
This bidirectional co-operation does not support by itself the causal role of the motor system to achieve language comprehension; rather it shows a very robust interaction between processes.
