Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
should we include
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "should we include" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when suggesting or questioning the addition of something to a list, plan, or discussion. Example: "In our meeting agenda, should we include a discussion on budget allocation?"
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
16 human-written examples
What else should we include?
News & Media
Mathematics is a universal language our galactic eavesdroppers would understand, but which bits should we include?
News & Media
How much of Rachel's life before she went to Gaza should we include?
News & Media
What great examples of failure in any field should we include here?
News & Media
Should we include any other mental states on the list?
Science
What should we include as part of our model?
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
43 human-written examples
Later I thought, why shouldn't we include foreign works.
News & Media
If animals suffer, the philosopher Peter Singer noted in "Animal Liberation" (1975), shouldn't we include them in the calculus of minimizing pain?
News & Media
Or should we just include him on the envelope containing his parents' invitation?
News & Media
Should we have included Pat Barker, Elizabeth Bowen, A.S. Byatt, Penelope Fitzgerald, Doris Lessing and Iris Murdoch?
News & Media
Should we have included Stella Gibson or Ellie Miller?
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Consider the audience and context when deciding whether to use "should we include". In formal settings, a more direct question might be appropriate, while in collaborative discussions, it encourages participation.
Common error
Avoid starting multiple consecutive sentences with "should we include" when brainstorming or creating lists. Vary your sentence structure by rephrasing some questions as statements or using alternatives like "let's consider adding" or "another option is".
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "should we include" primarily functions as an interrogative clause, used to propose or suggest the addition of something to a list, discussion, or plan. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase follows standard grammar rules and is usable in written English.
Frequent in
News & Media
32%
Science
48%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "should we include" is a grammatically correct and commonly used way to suggest adding something to a discussion, list, or plan. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in various contexts. Its neutral tone makes it appropriate for both formal and informal settings, with frequent usage in news and media, as well as scientific publications. When using this phrase, it's important to be clear about what you're suggesting and why it's relevant to the discussion.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
ought we to add
Replaces "should" with "ought", implying a moral obligation or advisability.
do we need to add
Focuses on the necessity of adding something, rather than just suggesting it.
is it necessary to include
More formal and emphasizes the essential nature of the inclusion.
what about adding
Informal and suggests an idea for consideration.
how about including
Similar to "what about adding" but with a slightly different phrasing.
would it be useful to add
Highlights the potential utility of adding something.
shall we consider
More formal and proposes a deliberation.
is it worth considering
Focuses on the value of thinking about including something.
what are your thoughts on including
Seeks opinions on the inclusion of something specific.
have we considered including
Asks whether the inclusion has been thought of before.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "should we include" to sound more formal?
For a more formal tone, you can use phrases like "is it necessary to include" or "shall we consider". These options convey a more serious and deliberate approach.
What's a more casual way to ask "should we include"?
Informal alternatives include "what about adding" or "how about including". These phrases are suitable for relaxed discussions and brainstorming sessions.
How does "should we include" differ from "do we need to include"?
"Should we include" suggests a consideration or possibility, whereas "do we need to add" implies a necessity. The latter indicates that the inclusion is essential or required.
When is it best to use "should we include" over other similar phrases?
"Should we include" is best used when you want to open a discussion or seek input on whether something is appropriate or relevant to add. It invites collaboration and consideration of different perspectives.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested