should revoke

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should revoke" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when suggesting that something needs to be taken back or canceled, often in a formal or legal context. Example: "The committee believes that the organization should revoke the membership of individuals who violate the code of conduct."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

25 human-written examples

State lawmakers should revoke that exemption.

The New York Times

"The government should revoke the ban immediately".

The Guardian

"The I.R.S. should revoke the exempt status," Professor Hill said.

The New York Times

King's College London should revoke the Sultan's honour.

The Guardian

The Federal Communications Commission should revoke the licenses of any station that does not correct this dishonest practice.

The New York Times

Liberty countered that they did, that the breakup diluted Liberty's voting control of IAC assets, and that the court should revoke Mr. Diller's proxy and block the spinoff.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

33 human-written examples

Kishan Shah, 18, a pre-med student from Carmel, Ind., said the university should not revoke Ms. Owen's degree, but "they should let her know that she has disgraced the school".

The New York Times

At a minimum it should issue a "notice to show cause" that would require WorldCom to demonstrate why the agency should not revoke all of its licenses and certifications.

The New York Times

You should never revoke a decision which you believe is the right one.

The Guardian - Sport

On Thursday, Clegg made clear he thought Britain should immediately revoke any licences for arms that had been used in the conflict.

The Guardian

But if the relatives balk, the Justice Department should quickly revoke their custody of the child and obtain a federal court order instructing them and their lawyers to turn Elian over to his father.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "should revoke", ensure the context clearly indicates what authority or entity has the power to revoke the item in question. For instance, "The council should revoke the permit" clarifies who holds the power.

Common error

Avoid using "should revoke" when it's unclear who possesses the authority to perform the revocation. Ambiguity can weaken the statement's impact. Instead, clearly state the responsible entity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should revoke" primarily functions as a modal verb phrase expressing a recommendation or obligation for an authorized entity to cancel or withdraw something formally. Ludwig AI identifies its frequent use in contexts where decisions and their potential reversals are discussed.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "should revoke" is a commonly used modal verb phrase that expresses a recommendation or obligation for an authorized entity to cancel something formally. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and primarily found in news and media contexts, though it also appears in scientific and business discussions. When employing this phrase, clarity regarding the entity with the power to revoke is essential. Alternatives such as "ought to rescind" or "must invalidate" offer nuanced variations in formality and emphasis. As revealed by Ludwig, understanding these aspects helps writers leverage the phrase effectively in diverse situations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to rescind

More formal alternative, emphasizing the official or legal cancellation of something.

must invalidate

Stronger emphasis on rendering something legally void.

has to withdraw

Focuses on the act of taking something back, often permission or an offer.

needs to repeal

Specifically refers to the cancellation of a law or regulation.

should overturn

Suggests reversing a decision or judgment.

should reverse

Implies changing the direction or outcome of something.

must abrogate

A formal and emphatic term for abolishing or repealing a law or agreement.

ought to cancel

Similar meaning but slightly more informal than "ought to rescind".

needs to retract

Focuses on taking back a statement or claim.

should disavow

Suggests denying responsibility for or connection with something.

FAQs

What does "should revoke" mean?

The phrase "should revoke" suggests that something, such as a law, license, or agreement, needs to be officially canceled or taken back. It implies a recommendation or necessity for a formal annulment.

When is it appropriate to use "should revoke" in a sentence?

It's appropriate to use "should revoke" when you want to express that an authority ought to officially cancel or withdraw something, like "The government "should repeal" the law" or "The committee "ought to rescind" the decision".

What are some alternatives to "should revoke"?

Alternatives to "should revoke" include phrases like ""ought to rescind"", "must invalidate", "has to withdraw", or "needs to repeal", each carrying slightly different connotations of formality and necessity.

How does "should revoke" differ from "can revoke"?

"Should revoke" expresses a recommendation or obligation, suggesting that canceling something is the right or necessary course of action. "Can revoke", on the other hand, simply indicates the ability or permission to cancel something, without implying a judgment on whether it is advisable.