Sentence examples for should not supersede from inspiring English sources
"The preferences of pet owners should not supersede the well-being of their fellow passengers," states the editorial.
The new higher wage should not supersede the statutory minimum wage but instead become a mark of best practice.
The hurt suffered by the exiles was indeed great, but it should not supersede the national interest of the United States.
The Istanbul Chamber of Architects has filed lawsuits against the project, saying that it violates a previous master plan for land use in the region and that a decision made by Ankara should not supersede a blueprint approved in Istanbul.
The narrative of Europe's management of and retreat from empire should not supersede the story Kershaw offers, but it is important to recognise that the two imperatives fed off one another in surprising ways.
Therefore, the exigencies of a few power holders should not supersede the interest of humanity through familiar practices of endorsement of undemocratic governments, not responsive to the will and needs of their people, and application of double and multiple standards of response to incidents around the globe.
Yoest's beliefs shouldn't supersede the science, says Dr. David Grimes, a retired obstetrician/gynecologist who formerly served as chief of the abortion surveillance branch at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
But he says history proves that business relationships shouldn't supersede the imperative to do what's right — after all, American businesses once worked with Nazi Germany, and that didn't stop the U.S. from ultimately moving against Hitler.
The perceived benefits of using EFM when staffing levels are low or when the clinical environment is busy should not, however, supersede best practice guidance which recommends the use of IA for low risk women during labour [ 36].
Against Death". The W version should not be superseded by P and C, a conclusion with which Hovey agrees.
He thinks this a serious flaw in Rawls's argument:If imagining a hypothetical social insurance contract signed in an original position does not supersede the right of a person to his own organs, why should it supersede the right of a person to the fruits of his own labor?Why indeed?
