The phrase "should not be straightforward" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is generally used to express a situation that is not simple or easy to understand. For example: - "The solution to this problem should not be straightforward; we will need to gather more data and consult with experts." - "I expected the instructions to be clear, but they should not be straightforward for someone who is not familiar with the technical terminology." - "The answer to this philosophical question should not be straightforward - it requires careful consideration and analysis."
Moreover, the extrapolation to ICU patients of what was observed in less severe patients should not be straightforward since administration of systemic steroids to ICU patients should outweigh the specific harm incurred by such treatment in critically ill patients (neuromyopathy, facilitation and worsening of sepsis, etc).
Moreover, the extrapolation to ICU patients of what was observed in less severe patients should not be straightforward since administration of systemic steroids to ICU patients should outweigh the specific harm incurred by such treatment in critically ill patients (neuromyopathy, facilitation and worsening of sepsis, etc).
We did not assess these qualities and prospective users of such software should be reminded that it might not be straightforward to reproduce any of the assemblies described in this study.
This might not be straightforward.
A return against Bournemouth should not be so straightforward.
Judging from implementation theory, the process should not be expected to be straightforward.
Stanley M. Brand, a Washington lawyer who follows ethical issues in the public sector, said Mrs. Clinton's deal appeared to be "straightforward," and should not be criticized merely because a high fee accompanies it.
For the current Labour leadership, the dispute should not be seen as a straightforward one in which it backs the strike.
John Gray argues, in the course of his defence of Millian Liberty, that one should not interpret this famous sentence without also considering Mill's other writings: in particular, and contrary to appearances, it should not be taken as a straightforward action-guiding principle (Gray 1996 p. 2 et seq).
A critic can argue that the construction of preferences for the combined alternative set {⟨A,0⟩, ⟨C,10⟩, ⟨B,20⟩, ⟨A,30⟩, ⟨C,40⟩, ⟨B,50⟩…} out of preferences over the primary alternative set ({A,B,C}) should not be performed in the straightforward simple way that was indicated in the examples.
Third, our indicators of treatment adequacy should not be interpreted as a straightforward criterion for evidence-based treatments, as patient preference, clinical expertise, help seeking behaviour and other patient, provider and system factors are associated with quality of care.
