should not be excluded

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should not be excluded" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when emphasizing that something is important and should be included in a discussion, consideration, or decision-making process. Example: "In our analysis, we found that certain factors should not be excluded from the final report to ensure comprehensive results."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That is why it should not be excluded a priori.

The Guardian - Business

Certainly the Ministry of Defence should not be excluded in looking for economies.

The Guardian - Opinion

But in a discussion of obscenity, the word cannot (really: should not) be excluded.

The New York Times

Newspaper editors, he added, "should play a part in the discussion, they should not be excluded completely.

The Guardian

But Rudd should not be excluded from the race, he says, although it would be an "uphill battle".

The Guardian

The Spanish government has also received a deluge of requests that taxpayer funds given to the king should not be excluded from a new transparency law.

The Guardian

"There are people who write and do real journalism in different ways than we're used to – and they should not be excluded".

The Guardian

Victims of domestic violence should not be excluded from accessing legal aid for family law disputes against an abusive ex-partner or relative because of these unrealistic regulations".

The Guardian

And the promise is not that each and every jury must include "one's peers," but that one's peers should not be excluded.

The New York Times

Asked about such a possibility, an unidentified state official was quoted by Ahram Online, the Web site of Egypt's leading newspaper, as saying: "It should not be excluded.

The New York Times

It should not be excluded?

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When arguing for the inclusion of a particular element, follow "should not be excluded" with a clear explanation of its relevance or importance to strengthen your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "should not be excluded" in overly simple sentences where a more direct phrase like "must be included" or "needs to be considered" would be more impactful.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should not be excluded" functions as a modal verb phrase indicating a recommendation or necessity for inclusion. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a grammatically sound expression.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

39%

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Social Media

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "should not be excluded" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression, as confirmed by Ludwig. It serves to advocate for inclusion, suggesting that something is important and warrants consideration. Predominantly found in science and news contexts, it maintains a neutral to formal tone. While versatile, it's best to avoid overuse in overly simple sentences for optimal impact. When using "should not be excluded", remember to clearly articulate why the element in question is relevant or important. As Ludwig AI suggests, several alternatives exist, such as "must be included" or "ought to be considered", depending on the desired level of emphasis and formality.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

should be taken into consideration

Similar in meaning, but slightly more verbose.

must be included

Stronger emphasis on necessity compared to "should not be excluded".

cannot be left out

More direct and straightforward than "should not be excluded".

ought to be considered

More formal and suggests a moral obligation to consider.

demands to be included

Stronger and more urgent than "should not be excluded".

cannot be ignored

Highlights the importance and necessity of attention.

merits consideration

Highlights that something deserves attention.

needs to be taken into account

Focuses on incorporating something into a calculation or decision.

warrants inclusion

Emphasizes justification for being included.

must be factored in

Focuses on incorporating something as a factor.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "should not be excluded" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases such as "must be included", "ought to be considered", or "cannot be ignored". These alternatives convey a sense of importance and necessity.

What's a simpler way to say "should not be excluded"?

Simpler alternatives include "must be included", "can't be left out", or "needs to be considered". These options are more direct and less formal.

When is it appropriate to use "should not be excluded"?

"Should not be excluded" is appropriate when you want to emphasize that something is important and needs to be considered or included in a decision-making process. For example, "Relevant data /s/should+not+be+excluded from the analysis".

What's the difference between "should not be excluded" and "should not be included"?

"Should not be excluded" implies that something is already under consideration and shouldn't be left out. "Should not be included" suggests that something is being proposed for inclusion but might not be suitable. They have opposite meanings.