should he concur

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should he concur" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in formal contexts when discussing the possibility of someone agreeing or giving their approval. Example: "The proposal will be submitted to the board for review, and should he concur, we will proceed with the next steps."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

He concurred in Engels's judgment that The Communist Manifesto should be shelved and the Communist League disbanded.

Encyclopedia Britannica

"He concurs," he said.

The New Yorker

"Much more," he concurred.

The New York Times - Magazine

He concurred heartily.

The New York Times

"Exactly," he concurred.

The New Yorker

"It's flow," he concurred.

The New Yorker

"Yes, that would be correct," he concurs.

The Guardian - Film

But he concurred that prices remained flat.

The New York Times

Mr. Williams said he concurred with Mr. O'Reilly.

The New York Times

He concurred, though, with Ms. Aziz's central point.

The New York Times

I bounced this idea off George Peabody and he concurred.

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "should he concur" in formal writing to introduce a condition based on someone's agreement, implying a degree of uncertainty.

Common error

Avoid using "should he concur" in informal contexts; simpler alternatives like "if he agrees" are often more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should he concur" functions as a conditional clause, introducing a scenario that depends on someone's agreement or alignment of opinion. Because Ludwig has no examples, its specific function is only theoretical.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "should he concur" is a grammatically correct phrase used to introduce a conditional clause based on someone's agreement. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical validity. While relatively formal, its usage is best suited for professional, academic, or otherwise formal contexts. Simpler alternatives such as "if he agrees" may be more appropriate in informal settings. As there are no real-world examples for the query, analysis is based on theoretical usage and grammatical structure.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

if he agrees

Replaces "should he concur" with a more common and direct conditional clause.

assuming he concurs

Uses "assuming" to introduce the condition of his agreement.

in the event that he concurs

Formal alternative emphasizing the possibility of his agreement.

if he is in agreement

Rephrases "concur" with "is in agreement" for clarity.

provided that he concurs

Specifies a condition of his agreement for a certain action.

on the condition that he agrees

Highlights the agreement as a prerequisite.

if his opinion aligns

Focuses on the alignment of opinions rather than direct agreement.

should he be of the same opinion

A more verbose alternative highlighting shared opinions.

assuming he gives his assent

Replaces "concur" with "gives his assent", implying formal approval.

if he gives the go-ahead

Informal alternative suggesting approval to proceed.

FAQs

What does "should he concur" mean?

The phrase "should he concur" means 'if he agrees' or 'if he is in agreement'. It is a formal way of expressing a conditional agreement.

When is it appropriate to use "should he concur"?

Use "should he concur" in formal writing or when you want to add a touch of sophistication to your language. In most casual conversations, a simpler phrase like "if he agrees" may be more suitable.

What are some alternatives to "should he concur"?

Alternatives include "if he agrees", "assuming he concurs", or "provided that he concurs". The best choice depends on the specific context and desired level of formality.

Is "should he concur" grammatically correct?

Yes, "should he concur" is grammatically correct. It employs an inversion structure common in formal conditional clauses.