should have eradicated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should have eradicated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to express a past expectation or obligation that something was supposed to be eliminated or removed. Example: "The government should have eradicated the disease by now, but it continues to spread."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

– last week's exhilarating developments should have eradicated it.

Independent

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Azithromycin alone would not have eradicated gut flora.

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Doctors and our patients have thousand of stories to tell about the implications of infectious diseases that should have been eradicated by now.

The Guardian - Opinion

The worries it and investors felt, should have been eradicated with a new record backlog and an assertion from the company that the margin degradation embedded within in it is small.

The Guardian - Business

"We can't let gender-based ad targeting online give new life to a form of discrimination that should have been eradicated long ago".

TechCrunch

One disturbing trend related to polio, which should have been eradicated globally decades ago, is its presence in Nigeria and Pakistan.

Los Angeles Times

If that means taking and slamming racist stereotypes that should have been eradicated years ago, then we say it's a great place for the series to start.

Huffington Post

These folks will twist themselves into pretzels making excuses for behavior and rhetoric that should have been eradicated half a century ago.

Huffington Post

"We've eradicated malaria.

The New York Times

Hershon has eradicated the sublime, the promise of the land.

The New York Times - Books

But the interior renovation had eradicated any prewar charm.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "should have eradicated" when indicating that something negative or undesirable was expected to be completely eliminated by a certain point in the past, but it wasn't. Be sure the context clearly establishes why this eradication was necessary or expected.

Common error

Avoid using "should have eradicated" for situations where complete removal isn't realistically possible or intended. "Mitigated", "controlled", or "reduced" may be more appropriate if the goal wasn't total elimination.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should have eradicated" functions as a modal verb phrase expressing regret, criticism, or expectation about a past action. Ludwig AI shows that it often appears in contexts where a problem or issue was expected to be eliminated but wasn't.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

10%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "should have eradicated" is used to express that something negative was expected to be eliminated in the past, but it was not. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase is grammatically correct and suitable for various contexts, though alternatives might be necessary to convey different nuances. When using this expression, be mindful of the implication of complete removal, and ensure that the context supports such a strong claim.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to have eliminated

Replaces "should" with "ought to", indicating a moral obligation or expectation.

needed to have eradicated

Emphasizes the necessity of the eradication.

was supposed to have eradicated

Indicates an expectation or plan that did not materialize.

was meant to have eradicated

Similar to "was supposed to have eradicated", highlighting intention.

should have wiped out

Uses "wiped out" as a more informal synonym for "eradicated".

should have gotten rid of

Employs a more colloquial expression for elimination.

should have abolished

Replaces "eradicated" with "abolished", implying a formal or systemic removal.

should have terminated

Uses "terminated" to suggest a definitive end.

should have removed

Offers a simpler, more direct alternative to "eradicated".

should have extinguished

Uses "extinguished", implying a complete suppression or end.

FAQs

How can I use "should have eradicated" in a sentence?

Use "should have eradicated" to express a past expectation or obligation that something was supposed to be completely eliminated. For example: "The disease "should have been eradicated" by now, but it continues to spread."

What can I say instead of "should have eradicated"?

You can use alternatives like "ought to have eliminated", "needed to have eradicated", or "was supposed to have eradicated" depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "should have eradicated" in formal writing?

Yes, "should have eradicated" is appropriate for formal writing, particularly when discussing issues related to public health, policy, or historical events. However, ensure the context warrants such a strong term.

What's the difference between "should have eradicated" and "should have controlled"?

"Should have eradicated" implies complete elimination, while "should have controlled" suggests managing or limiting something. The choice depends on whether the goal was total removal or simply containment.