should call for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'should call for' is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate one's desired course of action in a specific situation. For example, "Given the circumstances, I think we should call for reinforcements."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Groups should call for special pricing.

The New York Times - Arts

The Obama administration should call for Mr.

The New York Times

(Connecticut shoppers should call for an appointment).

The New York Times

Dr. Petit said Mr. Simcik should call for help.

The New York Times

At Rio, governments should call for smarter use of resources.

The New York Times

"Already weak fiscally, this should call for reducing energy subsidies.

The Guardian - Business

And it should call for targeted individual sanctions on those orchestrating the abuses.

Independent

They should call for both the Sedition Act and unlimited detention to go.

The Economist

He should call for an international initiative to help rebuild Greece.

University of California, Berkeley

Those wishing to meet the tour in Kew Gardens should call for information.

The New York Times - Arts

Mr. Spitzer, in his role overseeing charities, should call for public hearings in Albany.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "should call for", ensure the context clearly indicates what action or change is being advocated for, and who is expected to take that action.

Common error

Avoid using "should call for" without specifying the desired outcome or action. Be explicit about what you are advocating for.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should call for" functions as a verb phrase, expressing a recommendation, suggestion, or necessity for advocating a particular action or change. As evidenced by Ludwig, it indicates a desired course of action.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Academia

23%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "should call for" is a grammatically sound and frequently used verb phrase that recommends advocating for a specific action or change. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is typically used to indicate a desired course of action in a given situation. It is most commonly found in news, academic, and scientific contexts. To use it effectively, ensure the context is clear and specifies the desired outcome. While alternatives such as "should advocate" or "should request" exist, "should call for" offers a balanced and widely understood way to express advocacy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

should advocate

Focuses on public support and promotion.

should request

Direct and formal way to ask for something.

should recommend

Suggests a formal proposal.

ought to request

More formal and emphasizes obligation.

should propose

Similar to recommend but can also mean suggesting an idea

should push for

Suggests active efforts towards achieving something.

needs to demand

Implies urgency and necessity.

should seek

Implies an active search or pursuit.

must urge

Stronger emphasis on the need for action.

should champion

Conveys strong support and defense.

FAQs

How to use "should call for" in a sentence?

The phrase "should call for" is used to express that someone or something ought to advocate for a particular action or change. For example, "The report "should call for stricter regulations"." It indicates a recommendation or expectation of advocacy.

What can I say instead of "should call for"?

You can use alternatives like "should advocate", "should request", or "ought to demand" depending on the context. These alternatives maintain a similar meaning while varying in formality and intensity.

Which is correct, "should call for" or "should be calling for"?

Both "should call for" and "should be calling for" are grammatically correct, but they have slightly different nuances. "Should call for" suggests a general recommendation, while "should be calling for" implies an ongoing or continuous action of advocacy. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize a one-time action or a sustained effort.

What's the difference between "should call for" and "might call for"?

"Should call for" expresses a stronger recommendation or expectation than "might call for". "Should call for" indicates that something is advisable or necessary, while "might call for" suggests a possibility or potential need. The choice depends on the degree of certainty and urgency you want to convey.