should be written in

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of a sentence "should be written in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to convey the idea that something should be written in a particular way or format. For example: The assignment should be written in 12-point font.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

54 human-written examples

They should be written in south London.

The Guardian

It should be written in screenplay format.

Columbia University

Results should be written in past tense.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

"The constitution should be written in time.

The Washington Post

His definitive biography should be written in mathematical symbols.

The New Yorker

It should be written in a fairly informal, personal style.

The Guardian

Some have commented that this event should be written in the history of journalism.

The New York Times

"The issue of enrichment should be written in the agreement and Iran's enrichment will be recognised.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

3 human-written examples

Martinique's vicar general begins his account of the eruption, "This date should be written in blood".

The New York Times - Books

In addition, scores and percentiles should be written in the application form.

Duke University

Vignettes should be written in the third-person point-of-view to portray realistic scenarios for the reader.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "should be written in", ensure clarity regarding the target audience. Tailor the language and style to suit their level of understanding.

Common error

Avoid using jargon or overly complex language when the intended audience is not familiar with the subject matter. Always consider the reader's perspective.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be written in" functions as a modal passive construction. It indicates a recommendation or requirement concerning the manner in which something is expressed in written form. As Ludwig AI points out, it is grammatically correct and frequently used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

32%

Science

30%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Wiki

12%

Formal & Business

6%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "should be written in" is a versatile and grammatically sound construction used to express recommendations or requirements about written communication. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and widely applicable. Its frequency across diverse sources, including news, science, and academia, highlights its relevance in various contexts. Remember to tailor your writing style and language to match the intended audience and purpose, as this ensures your message is effectively conveyed. Considering that the phrase is very common, ensure also that its use is natural and not redundant: in order to do this, one may consider alternatives like "ought to be expressed in", "needs to be composed in" or "must be documented in".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to be expressed in

Replaces "should" with "ought to", conveying a slightly stronger sense of obligation or advisability.

needs to be composed in

Substitutes "written" with "composed", emphasizing the act of creation or arrangement.

must be documented in

Replaces "written" with "documented", highlighting the need for official record-keeping.

has to be phrased in

Changes "written" to "phrased", focusing on the specific wording or expression used.

is required to be in

Emphasizes the mandatory nature of the format or language, using a more formal tone.

should be presented in

Shifts the focus from writing to overall presentation, suggesting a broader scope.

should be articulated in

Replaces "written" with "articulated", focusing on clarity and expressiveness.

should be rendered in

Uses "rendered" instead of "written", often used in technical contexts related to visual representation.

should be drafted in

Implies a preliminary version or sketch, using "drafted" instead of "written".

should be recorded in

Focuses on the act of preserving information, suggesting a more permanent form.

FAQs

How can I use "should be written in" in a sentence?

You can use "should be written in" to express a recommendation or requirement for how something is documented or composed. For example, "The report should be written in plain English" or "Code comments should be written in a clear and concise manner."

What are some alternatives to "should be written in"?

Alternatives include "ought to be expressed in", "needs to be composed in", or "must be documented in", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey. Each alternative offers a slightly different emphasis on obligation, composition, or record-keeping. See "ought to be expressed in" and "needs to be composed in".

Is it better to say "should be written in" or "must be written in"?

The choice between "should be written in" and "must be written in" depends on the level of obligation you want to express. "Should" suggests a recommendation, while "must" implies a requirement. For example, 'Guidelines should be written in simple terms' versus 'Legal contracts must be written in precise language'.

What does it mean when something "should be written in" a particular style?

When something "should be written in" a specific style, it means it's recommended or required to adhere to certain conventions of language, tone, or format. For example, a scientific paper should be written in a formal and objective style, whereas a blog post should be written in a more informal and engaging style.