should be scrutinised

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should be scrutinised" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something requires careful examination or analysis. Example: "The financial reports should be scrutinised to ensure accuracy before submission."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

38 human-written examples

This year, even the simplest of words and phrases should be scrutinised.

The Guardian - Music

The police also argued that "much of the detail of past and current deployments" should be scrutinised in private.

The Guardian

But that claim is based on little hard evidence; the IMF work suggests it should be scrutinised extremely carefully.

The Guardian - Business

The president promises to provide detailed proposals for a long-term solution in the coming weeks, and his ideas should be scrutinised carefully.

The Economist

The report effectively advocated open-book accounting – ie that public funds, even when channelled to private firms, through outsourcing and commercial contracts should be scrutinised.

The Guardian - Opinion

It says appointments should be scrutinised by a committee, which could attach conditions to prevent those involved using their new role to further other interests.

Independent

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

22 human-written examples

Now that the first group of second wave companies has proved that the public, investors and the city all buy in to the prospects of companies dealing thin the high-touch, entrepreneurs should be scrutinising the high street for possibilities.

TechCrunch

It suggests they should all be scrutinised once a year by their owners.

The Economist

I'm not saying Ceta is perfect, nor that it shouldn't be scrutinised.

The Guardian - Opinion

The Tories claim other parties should also be scrutinised by the police for election expense irregularities during the general election.

The Guardian

The conventional view is that faith, in general, is something self-evidently desirable whose contents should not be scrutinised too closely.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "should be scrutinised", ensure that the subject requiring scrutiny is clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify "the financial statements should be scrutinised" rather than just "it should be scrutinised".

Common error

Avoid using "should be scrutinised" in very casual conversations or informal writing. Opt for simpler alternatives like "should be checked" or "should be looked at" to maintain a natural tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be scrutinised" functions as a modal passive construction, indicating a recommendation or necessity for something to be carefully and critically examined. This is supported by Ludwig's analysis, which confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. For instance, in the example 'The report effectively advocated open-book accounting – ie that public funds... should be scrutinised', it highlights the need for careful review.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Reference

5%

Wiki

3%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "should be scrutinised" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression that signifies the necessity for careful and critical examination. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and usable in written English. Predominantly found in news, scientific, and formal business contexts, it emphasizes the importance of thorough review and accountability. While the phrase is effective in conveying a need for scrutiny, it is advisable to use it judiciously in informal settings, opting for simpler alternatives when appropriate. Related phrases include "ought to be examined" and "needs to be investigated", offering varied options for expressing the same underlying concept.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to be examined

Replaces "should" with "ought to", implying a moral obligation or advisability to examine.

needs to be investigated

Focuses on the investigative aspect of scrutiny, suggesting a more formal inquiry.

requires careful consideration

Emphasizes the need for thoughtful deliberation and assessment.

demands close inspection

Highlights the necessity of a detailed and thorough examination.

must be reviewed thoroughly

Stresses the importance of a complete and exhaustive review process.

warrants detailed analysis

Indicates that a comprehensive analysis is justified or necessary.

is worthy of examination

Suggests that something is important or interesting enough to be examined.

merits careful evaluation

Implies that something deserves a thoughtful assessment to determine its value or significance.

calls for in-depth assessment

Indicates a need for a profound and thorough evaluation.

is subject to rigorous assessment

Highlights that something will be evaluated according to strict and demanding standards.

FAQs

How can I use "should be scrutinised" in a sentence?

Use "should be scrutinised" to indicate that something needs careful and critical examination. For example, "The contract details should be scrutinised before signing."

What are some alternatives to "should be scrutinised"?

You can use alternatives such as "needs to be investigated", "requires careful consideration", or "demands close inspection" depending on the specific context.

What is the difference between "should be scrutinised" and "should be checked"?

"Should be checked" implies a simple verification process, while "should be scrutinised" suggests a more thorough and critical examination.

Is "should be scrutinised" appropriate for formal writing?

Yes, "should be scrutinised" is appropriate for formal writing. It conveys a sense of importance and the necessity of a detailed review, suitable for reports, academic papers, and professional documents.