Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

should be replaced by

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should be replaced by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are suggesting something that should be substituted or changed in a certain situation. For example, "The old equipment should be replaced by newer models in order to improve efficiency."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He said the European parliament should be replaced by an assembly of national parliaments.

News & Media

The Guardian

He said this should be replaced by independent regulation rather than statutory regulation.

News & Media

The Guardian

The system of "need to know" should be replaced by a system of "need to share".

News & Media

The New York Times

Open drawers should be replaced by a locked cabinet next to the doorman's station.

News & Media

The New York Times

The Band of Her Majesty's Royal Marines should be replaced by DJs and decks.

A key part of the proposals is that skilled librarians should be replaced by volunteers.

Political appointees, like Salem Chalabi, should be replaced by qualified, independent jurists.

News & Media

The New York Times

The elections board should be replaced by a competent, independent staff.

News & Media

The New York Times

Firms that can't manage their risk should be replaced by firms that can.

News & Media

The New York Times

Some 58% think that the licence fee should be replaced by advertising.

News & Media

The Economist

It should be replaced by a statue of Edward II, in whose reign Oriel was founded.

News & Media

Independent
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "should be replaced by" when suggesting a direct substitution to improve functionality, correctness, or efficiency. Ensure the replacement is a viable and superior alternative.

Common error

While "should be replaced by" is useful, overuse can make your writing sound monotonous. Vary your language by using synonyms like "ought to be substituted with" or other related phrases to maintain reader engagement.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be replaced by" functions as a modal verb phrase indicating a recommendation or necessity for substitution. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically sound and commonly used. The examples in Ludwig show it being used in a variety of contexts, from suggesting improvements to correcting errors.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

28%

News & Media

68%

Encyclopedias

4%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "should be replaced by" is a grammatically correct and very common expression used to recommend or suggest a substitution. As Ludwig AI points out, it’s versatile and applicable across different contexts, especially in News & Media and Science. While it indicates a suggested improvement, it’s important to avoid overuse and consider synonyms such as "ought to be substituted with". The phrase maintains a neutral register, making it suitable for professional and formal communication. When employing "should be replaced by", ensure that the proposed substitute is viable and presents a clear advantage over the original.

More alternative expressions(10)

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to be substituted with

Changes the modal verb to "ought to" which has similar meaning to "should" but sounds slightly more formal.

needs to be exchanged for

Replaces "replaced" with "exchanged", emphasizing a swap, and changes the modal verb to "needs to" to convey necessity.

must be superseded by

Substitutes "replaced" with "superseded", indicating that something is being upgraded or is becoming obsolete. Replaces "should" with "must" for stronger emphasis.

has to be switched with

Uses "switched with" for a more informal tone than "replaced by" and changes the modal verb to "has to be" for emphasis.

should give way to

Emphasizes the act of yielding or making space for something else and uses a more metaphorical term than "replaced".

is recommended to be substituted by

Indicates that substitution is being recommended. This is more indirect than "should be replaced by".

is advised to be exchanged with

Similar to "is recommended to be substituted by", but uses the word "advised" conveying a recommendation and "exchanged" instead of "substituted".

it is better to replace it with

This shifts the focus to making a better choice or improvement. It's more explanatory, less direct than original query.

the better alternative is

Implies that "should be replaced by" is unnecessary, as the better option is evident. This makes the user directly assume replacement will happen.

a better option would be

Presents a different option as preferable, implying that the original should be replaced but without directly stating it.

FAQs

How can I use "should be replaced by" in a sentence?

Use "should be replaced by" to suggest a substitution, like: "The old tires should be replaced by new ones for safety."

What are some alternatives to "should be replaced by"?

You can use alternatives like "ought to be substituted with", "needs to be exchanged for", or "must be superseded by" depending on the context.

Is "should be replaced with" grammatically correct?

While similar in meaning, "should be replaced by" is generally preferred. "Should be replaced with" isn't incorrect, but "by" emphasizes the replacing entity more clearly.

What's the difference between "should be replaced by" and "should be substituted with"?

"Should be replaced by" and "should be substituted with" are largely interchangeable. "Should be substituted with" might emphasize a more exact or technical substitution, but the practical difference is minimal.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: