should be remanded

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should be remanded" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in legal contexts to indicate that a case or matter should be sent back to a lower court or authority for further action or consideration. Example: "The appellate court determined that the case should be remanded for a new trial due to procedural errors."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Potential new Forest owner Evangelos Marinakis – reacting after an Athens prosecutor said he should be remanded in custody on disputed charges of fraud, extortion, bribery, running a match-fixing gang and having a referee's bakery blown up.

The Guardian - Sport

President Bush's Treasury secretary, Henry Paulson, should be remanded to the witness chair.

Forbes

The result of the case was the Criminal Lunatics Act 1800; Parliament, concerned that similar criminals could be allowed to go free, provided that somebody found "not guilty by reason of insanity" should be remanded in custody until granted a royal pardon.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Assange has been refused bail and will be remanded in custody till 14 December.

TechCrunch

Which is why they must be remanded forever to our Magical Island Prison!

Huffington Post

Although his legal team were visibly shocked that Assange was remanded into custody last week, experienced criminal lawyers said that possibility should have been foreseen.

The Guardian

Nimmo was remanded in custody.

The Guardian

He was remanded to detention.

The Guardian

They are remanded in custody.

The Guardian

Maxwell was remanded in custody.

The Guardian

And some cases are remanded multiple times.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "should be remanded" in legal or formal contexts when referring to the act of sending a case or individual back into custody for further proceedings or consideration. Ensure the context clearly indicates the reasons for the remand.

Common error

Avoid using "should be remanded" in casual or informal conversations. This phrase carries a specific legal weight and sounds out of place when discussing everyday situations. Instead, opt for phrases like "should be detained" or "needs to be held" if you wish to convey a similar idea without the legal connotation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be remanded" primarily functions as a passive voice construction, expressing a recommendation or requirement for a case or individual to be returned to custody or a lower court. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for formal, legal contexts.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

67%

Wiki

33%

Science

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "should be remanded" is a formal construction primarily used in legal contexts to indicate that a case or individual should be returned to custody or a lower court for further proceedings. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and most frequently found in news and media reporting on legal matters. While grammatically sound, it is crucial to use this phrase in appropriate contexts, avoiding informal situations where simpler alternatives like "ought to be detained" may be more suitable.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is subject to custodial remand

Uses more formal legal language, focusing on the subjection to a specific type of remand.

ought to be detained

Replaces "should" with "ought to", suggesting a moral obligation, and "remanded" with "detained", focusing on the act of holding someone.

shall be placed in detention

Uses the mandatory "shall" instead of "should", emphasizing a legal requirement.

must be held in custody

Emphasizes the necessity of being held in custody, using stronger language than "should be remanded".

is to be kept in detention

This alternative focuses on the action of keeping someone in detention rather than the legal process of remanding.

needs to be taken into custody

Shifts the focus to the act of taking someone into custody, implying a more immediate action.

requires to be imprisoned

Highlights the requirement of imprisonment, which is a more direct consequence than being remanded.

warrants being confined

Focuses on the justification for confinement, suggesting the person's actions merit being confined.

deserves to be incarcerated

Emphasizes the deservedness of incarceration, indicating that the person's actions merit such a punishment.

is liable to be detained

Highlights the potential or likelihood of being detained, suggesting a legal consequence.

FAQs

What does "should be remanded" mean in a legal context?

In a legal context, "should be remanded" means that a case or an individual is sent back into custody or to a lower court for further consideration or proceedings. It often implies that there is a need for additional investigation or that a previous decision needs to be reviewed.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "should be remanded"?

The phrase "should be remanded" is appropriate in legal documents, court proceedings, or discussions about legal matters where the status of a case or individual's custody is being addressed. Avoid using it in informal settings.

What are some alternatives to "should be remanded" that aren't as formal?

If you need to express a similar idea in a less formal way, consider using phrases like "ought to be detained" or "must be held in custody", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "should be remanded" grammatically correct?

Yes, "should be remanded" is grammatically correct. The modal verb "should" is correctly followed by the passive voice construction "be remanded". Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in written English.