should be reappointed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should be reappointed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the continuation of someone's position or role, typically in a professional or organizational context. Example: "After reviewing her performance, the committee concluded that she should be reappointed to her position for another term."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Most presidential hopefuls heap respectful praise on the head of America's central bank and, from Al Gore to Elizabeth Dole, have recommended that he should be reappointed when his term as Federal Reserve chairman formally ends next May.

The Economist

Mr. Provopoulos's six-year term concludes next June, and while it is customary for new prime ministers to name their own central bank heads, a growing number of bankers and investors argue that Mr. Provopoulos should be reappointed in light of the country's fragile financial condition.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

Hodgson maintains that Dalglish, who turned 60 last month, should now be reappointed to the position the Scotsman relinquished early in 1991.

Independent

So, Mr. Conway said, he told Mr. Pataki's staff that Mr. Malan should not be reappointed, and he was not.

The New York Times

Will he be reappointed?

The New York Times

He/she can be reappointed.

The Guardian

Does Ben Bernanke deserve to be reappointed as Fed chairman?

Independent

Mr. Feerick will be reappointed chairman, Mr. Spitzer has said.

The New York Times

Her appointment is for a term ending in 2013, although she could be reappointed.

The New York Times

"I couldn't imagine him wanting to be reappointed," the senator said.

The New York Times

SO BEN BERNANKE is to be reappointed for a second term.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "should be reappointed", ensure that the context clearly indicates the position or role to which the person might be reappointed. This avoids ambiguity and enhances clarity.

Common error

Avoid stating simply that someone "should be reappointed" without providing a rationale. Explain the qualities, achievements, or circumstances that justify the reappointment to lend weight to the assertion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be reappointed" functions as a recommendation or endorsement for an individual to continue in their current position. It suggests that there are reasons supporting the decision to extend their tenure. Ludwig AI confirms this usage through its examples.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Encyclopedias

15%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Science

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "should be reappointed" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to advocate for the continuation of someone's position. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is suitable for various contexts, particularly in news media and professional discussions. When using this phrase, it's important to provide context and reasons supporting the recommendation to avoid ambiguity. While alternatives like "deserves reappointment" or "ought to be renominated" exist, the original phrase is widely understood and professionally appropriate.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

deserves reappointment

Emphasizes the merit or worthiness of the person for being reappointed.

ought to be renominated

Focuses on the formal process of nominating someone again.

is recommended for another term

Highlights the suggestion or endorsement for extending the term.

is advised to be kept in position

Indicates a recommendation to maintain the person's current role.

merits continued tenure

Stresses the deserving nature of the individual's continued holding of the position.

warrants further service

Highlights the justification for allowing continued service.

is proposed for continuation

Focuses on the act of suggesting or proposing the continuation of the person's role.

is favored for a second term

Indicates preference or support for the person to have another term.

continuation is advocated

Highlights the act of publicly supporting or recommending continuation.

retention is encouraged

Focuses on the act of promoting or urging the retention of the person.

FAQs

When is it appropriate to use "should be reappointed"?

Use "should be reappointed" when expressing an opinion or recommendation that someone's term or position "ought to be renewed" due to their performance, expertise, or other relevant factors.

What are some alternative ways to say "should be reappointed"?

You can use phrases like "deserves reappointment", "is recommended for another term", or "ought to be renominated" depending on the context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is "should be reappointed" a formal or informal expression?

"Should be reappointed" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts. However, it's most commonly found in news articles, professional discussions, and formal evaluations.

What factors might influence whether someone "should be reappointed"?

Factors include the individual's past performance, their alignment with organizational goals, the presence of suitable replacements, and the overall stability and effectiveness of the team or organization.