Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase 'should be plural' is correct and usable in written English
You can use it to indicate that a noun should be made plural. For example, "The noun 'child' should be plural as it refers to more than one person."
Exact(11)
The verbs in relative clauses like these should be plural.
Recorded announcement: In this construction, the verb in the relative clause should be plural.
The verb in the relative clause should be plural: of the skeptics who agree with the White House, Tribe is one.
Yes, that recorded announcement again: In this construction, the verb in the relative clause should be plural; the clause describes all the "anachronisms," not just "one".
There, too, messiness, the unstructured and a lack of standards reign: there is no consensus if it should be plural or singular.
They can only be singular, even when, instinctively, you think they should be plural: ho visto alcuni film di Bertolucci means literally: "I've seen some of Bertolucci's film [no "s"]".
Similar(49)
Yet, in grammatically accurate Italian, Tetzlaff told her, the second word should be the plural, Soli.
For the future, caregivers should be in plural.
Oh, and shouldn't that episode title be plural?
In this instance, "couple" should have been plural: "the couple have…" See the stylebook entry: couple may be either singular or plural.
Be mindful of nouns that are always considered to be plural, such as children and people — here, you should use 's even though the nouns are plural.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com