Sentence examples for should be on development from inspiring English sources

The focus should be on development, not sustainability.

The emphasis should be on development of clear definitions and procedures.

(For example, the rise of the Atkins diet book on the best sellers' list might have been a signal that Coors employees or others could have brought to management's attention). The emphasis should be on developments that are outside the organization's main area of focus but potentially threatening to the core.

Future research should focus on in vitro evaluation and subsequent treatment trials of untested, but registered antimicrobials, and emphasis should be on the development of treatment algorithms including dual therapy and resistance testing in order to minimise the development of resistance.

Others said the focus should be on economic development rather than on specific health or education initiatives.

Key focus should be on the development of innovative designs that incorporates high-capacity, efficient, and stable materials, emphasizing the demonstration of practical viability of such integrated PV-battery systems.

Research on conversion technologies for biobased products seems to consider a divergent approach [19], which means that the focus should be on technology development rather than a specific product.

Cities face a chronic stresses or acute impacts, therefore special focus should be on the development of regulations and incentives to the interactions of concepts on climate change, city adaptation and resilience, through the perspective of transition for urban resilience, which enable cities change and build capacity of innovation in face of uncertainty (Ernstson et al. 2010).

A priority for future research should be on the development of new models of care that better cater for these patients.

The emphases of education and counseling should be on the development of behaviors that support long-term weight loss or weight maintenance with less focus on the outcome of weight loss.

Emphasis should be on the development and acquisition of simple and inexpensive tools rather than complicated equipment, to prevent critical care from unduly diverting resources away from other important parts of the health system.