Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(27)
The results reported in [49] should be mentioned as well.
High tolerance (during reduction of oxygen) of the optimum Ir-based catalyst (functionalized using selenourea) to the parasitic (e.g. in polymer membrane fuel cells) simultaneous oxidation of organic fuels (e.g. methanol or ethanol) should be mentioned as well.
A few limitations should be mentioned as well.
However, some limitations should be mentioned as well.
Furthermore, the database specific parameters they used in OrthoDB and OrthoMCL should be mentioned as well as the database version they used, e.g. OrthoDB2, or OrthoDB3, …, or OrthoDB6.
In this regard, the above-mentioned new "Patientombuddet" institution should be mentioned as it allows for less specifically outlined complaints to be handled (e.g. without reference to named health professionals).
Similar(33)
The subject should not even be mentioned as long as the question of criminalizing colonialism has not been resolved.
It should be mentioned that as much as you prolong anhepatic survival the more side-effects like potential transient hypothermia or septical complications will disturb the reproducibility of the model.
Last, but not least, it should be mentioned that as is well known, (4.1) exhibits chaotic behavior and this can be deduced from its period doubling bifurcation diagram [7, page 47].
The internal consistency of the ADSHQ should be mentioned here as well.
There is a question of philosophical importance that should be mentioned here: As it stands, Gödel's second incompleteness theorem only establishes the unprovability of one sentence, Cons F).
More suggestions(15)
should be suggested as
should be referenced as
should be acknowledged as
should be incorporated as
should be cited as
should be envisioned as
should be referred as
should be noted as
should be separated as
should be reviewed as
should be interviewed as
should be pleased as
should be managed as
should be considered as
should be discussed as
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com