should be eradicated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should be eradicated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when expressing the opinion that something should be completely eliminated or removed. Example: "In my view, all forms of discrimination should be eradicated to create a more inclusive society."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

One should be eradicated, the other replaced.

The New York Times - Magazine

Furthermore, she said, poverty should be eradicated.

Columbia University

Poverty should be eradicated, not seen as a money-making opportunity.

The New York Times

"Poverty should be eradicated," he wrote, "not seen as a moneymaking opportunity".

The New York Times

This problem should be eradicated by digital projection, as the titles will be added to the action electronically, as they are currently with most DVDs.

The Guardian - Film

The majority of people in Iraqi Kurdistan think female genital mutilation (FGM) should be eradicated and blame traditional beliefs for its continued practice.

The Guardian

Instead, Dr. Bruce Aylward, a polio official at the agency, said, "we could see thousands paralyzed at a time when the disease should be eradicated".

The New York Times

Three months after the world was declared smallpox-free, Henderson was asked to address a meeting convened to decide which disease should be eradicated next.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

3 human-written examples

He said that the "depravity" of homosexuality should indeed be eradicated, but through "preaching and guidance" rather than violence.

The Economist

So should they be eradicated?

BBC

Despite this situation, many Kyrgyz villagers still have a clear view that wolves shouldn't be eradicated since predators belong to nature and are regarded as having a sanitary role: "It is good to have predators.

Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "should be eradicated" when advocating for the complete removal of something undesirable, whether it's a social problem, a disease, or a flawed system. Ensure the context supports such a strong stance.

Common error

Avoid using "should be eradicated" in situations where a less forceful term would suffice. Overusing this phrase can make your writing sound overly dramatic or aggressive when a more moderate tone is appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be eradicated" functions as a modal verb phrase expressing a strong recommendation or necessity for complete removal or elimination. It indicates that something is considered undesirable and requires decisive action to eliminate it, as demonstrated by Ludwig AI.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

47%

Science

38%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "should be eradicated" is a modal verb phrase used to express a strong conviction that something needs to be completely eliminated. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is grammatically correct and frequently used across various contexts, particularly in news, science, and formal business settings. When using this phrase, ensure that the context warrants such a forceful term. Alternatives such as "ought to be eliminated" or "must be abolished" can be used depending on the desired tone and formality.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to be eliminated

Replaces "should" with "ought to", which conveys a similar sense of obligation or necessity but can sound slightly more formal.

needs to be eliminated

Substitutes "should be" with "needs to be", emphasizing the necessity of removal.

must be abolished

Replaces "eradicated" with "abolished", indicating a formal or official removal.

has to be removed

Uses "has to be" instead of "should be", implying a strong requirement for removal.

should be eliminated entirely

Adds "entirely" to emphasize the completeness of the removal process.

should be completely removed

Specifies "completely removed" instead of "eradicated", clarifying the action to be taken.

should be done away with

Uses the idiomatic expression "done away with" to mean eliminated or abolished.

should be stamped out

Replaces "eradicated" with "stamped out", suggesting a forceful suppression or elimination.

should be rooted out

Employs "rooted out" to imply a thorough and complete removal, as if pulling something up by the roots.

should cease to exist

Replaces "eradicated" with a more dramatic "cease to exist", highlighting the end of something's presence.

FAQs

How to use "should be eradicated" in a sentence?

You can use "should be eradicated" to express a strong opinion that something needs to be completely removed or eliminated. For example, "Poverty should be eradicated to ensure social justice."

What can I say instead of "should be eradicated"?

You can use alternatives like "ought to be eliminated", "needs to be eliminated", or "must be abolished" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "should be eradicated" or "should be eliminate"?

"Should be eradicated" is correct. "Eradicated" is the past participle form of the verb "eradicate", which is needed after "be" to form the passive voice. "Should be eliminate" is grammatically incorrect.

What's the difference between "should be eradicated" and "should be removed"?

"Should be eradicated" implies a complete and thorough removal, often of something deeply rooted or widespread. "Should be removed" is more general and can refer to simply taking something away, without necessarily implying a total elimination. For instance, “a stain should be removed” is less strong than “a disease should be eradicated”.