should be eliminated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should be eliminated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when suggesting that something is unnecessary or should be removed from a situation or context. Example: "In order to improve the clarity of the report, any redundant information should be eliminated."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They should be eliminated.

The New York Times

All should be eliminated.

The Guardian - Opinion

They should be eliminated entirely.

The New York Times

Ogundele suggested she should be eliminated.

Independent

He should be eliminated from the Olympics".

The New Yorker

"And cleavage should be eliminated completely.

The New York Times

And export subsidies should be eliminated.

The Economist

In addition, headfirst slides should be eliminated.

The New York Times - Sports

In extreme cases, they should be eliminated.

The New York Times - Arts

This "temporary" visa program should be eliminated.

The New York Times

The $87,900 cap should be eliminated.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "should be eliminated", ensure that the context clearly indicates what action will be taken after the elimination. Providing specific alternatives or solutions enhances the impact of your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "should be eliminated" without clearly specifying what the subject is. Instead of saying, "Waste should be eliminated," clarify by stating, "Unnecessary packaging waste should be eliminated to reduce environmental impact."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be eliminated" functions as a recommendation or suggestion that something is unnecessary, unwanted, or harmful and thus needs to be removed. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. Examples show it used in various contexts from eliminating toxic banking practices to removing errors in scientific models.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Academia

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "should be eliminated" is a grammatically sound and widely used expression for recommending the removal of something deemed undesirable or unnecessary. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's correct and versatile, appearing frequently in news, science, and formal business contexts. While it's important to specify the subject clearly to avoid vagueness, the phrase serves as a practical way to advocate for improvements and corrections in various situations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to be removed

Replaces "should" with "ought to", suggesting a moral obligation rather than just a recommendation.

needs to be discarded

Emphasizes the act of getting rid of something useless or unwanted.

must be eradicated

Implies a more forceful and complete removal, often used for abstract concepts like diseases or errors.

has to be terminated

Suggests a formal ending or cessation, often in the context of contracts or programs.

should be abolished

Specifically refers to the formal ending of a system, practice, or institution.

should be phased out

Indicates a gradual removal over time, rather than an immediate elimination.

should be suppressed

Suggests actively preventing something from continuing or developing.

should be nullified

Implies making something invalid or legally void.

should be discontinued

Indicates stopping a process or activity.

should be discontinued

Indicates stopping a process or activity.

FAQs

How can I use "should be eliminated" in a sentence?

Use "should be eliminated" to suggest that something is unnecessary or harmful and needs to be removed. For example, "Redundant steps in the process should be eliminated to improve efficiency."

What are some alternatives to "should be eliminated"?

You can use alternatives like "ought to be removed", "needs to be discarded", or "must be eradicated" depending on the context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "should be eliminated"?

While "should be eliminated" is in the passive voice, it is often used when the actor is unknown or unimportant. If the actor is important, consider rewriting in the active voice: "The committee should eliminate the redundant steps."

What is the difference between "should be eliminated" and "should be reduced"?

"Should be eliminated" implies complete removal, while "should be reduced" suggests lessening the amount or impact without necessarily getting rid of it entirely.