should be egalitarian

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should be egalitarian" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing principles, policies, or systems that are expected to promote equality among individuals or groups. Example: "In a just society, all laws should be egalitarian, ensuring that every citizen has equal rights and opportunities."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

Toilet cubicles should remain private, but public toilets should be egalitarian in their access.

Independent

The prices may be elitist, but Arnault is adamant that the brand should be egalitarian.

The Guardian

Learned leadership from brotherhood: "It should be egalitarian; we all have different skills".

Forbes

In the workplace, this can make for a cross-generational melee: conflicts between millennials who believe the office should be egalitarian, casual and quick to reward, and boomer-managers whose buttons get pushed by their young employees' expectations of a gimme-ocracy.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Raises should not be egalitarian; they should be meritocratic.

Huffington Post

He was egalitarian in his applause.

The New Yorker

In this sense, author events are egalitarian.

The Guardian - Books

If Sir Nicholas is such a staunch egalitarian between the future and the past, Sir Partha complains, he should be more egalitarian between the rich and the poor.For his part, Mr Nordhaus argues that if Sir Nicholas insists on a relatively low value of eta, he must pick a higher value of delta: something like 3% not 0.1%.

The Economist

I used to think that the interior of a plane should be an egalitarian place where all are treated equally (assuming they have paid enough).

The Economist

People have different values in relation to the extent to which they think society should be flatly egalitarian, or whether societal assets should be distributed unequally according to need.

BMC Medical Ethics

We should not expect them to be egalitarian in 2013 terms and mark them down where they fall short.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When advocating for fairness, use "should be egalitarian" to emphasize the importance of treating everyone equally, regardless of their background or status.

Common error

Avoid using "should be egalitarian" in situations where merit, skill, or effort should be the primary determinant. For example, raises in a company should be meritocratic, not necessarily egalitarian; otherwise, you risk de-motivating high-performing individuals.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be egalitarian" functions as a prescriptive statement, advocating for a particular state or condition. It suggests that something (a system, policy, or practice) ought to embody egalitarian principles. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

23%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "should be egalitarian" is grammatically sound and serves to advocate for fairness and equality. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. While not overly common, its presence in News & Media and scientific sources demonstrates its relevance in discussions about social justice and equitable systems. Consider alternative phrasings such as "ought to be equitable" or "must be fair" to suit specific contexts, and be mindful of situations where meritocratic principles outweigh the need for strict egalitarianism. Understanding these nuances ensures effective and appropriate communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to be equitable

Replaces "should" with "ought to", implying a moral obligation, and "egalitarian" with "equitable", focusing on fairness and impartiality.

must be fair

Replaces "should be egalitarian" with a simpler, more direct expression emphasizing fairness.

needs to be impartial

Substitutes "egalitarian" with "impartial", stressing unbiased treatment and objectivity.

has to be unbiased

Replaces "should" with "has to" for a stronger obligation and uses "unbiased" to highlight the absence of prejudice.

is required to be just

Replaces "egalitarian" with "just", focusing on moral rightness and fairness in treatment and outcome and adding "is required to be" to make a stronger call for it.

is expected to be balanced

Uses "balanced" instead of "egalitarian", emphasizing even distribution and proportional representation.

should ensure equality

Shifts the focus to the action of ensuring equality, rather than directly stating something needs to be egalitarian.

should promote fairness

Highlights the act of promoting fairness instead of focusing on the state of being egalitarian.

should guarantee equal rights

Concentrates on the guarantee of equal rights, making the phrase more specific and action-oriented.

should strive for parity

Replaces "egalitarian" with "parity", emphasizing the aim for equivalence and balance.

FAQs

How can I use "should be egalitarian" in a sentence?

You can use "should be egalitarian" to advocate for fairness and equal treatment in various contexts. For example: "Public policies should be egalitarian, ensuring equal opportunities for all citizens."

What phrases are similar to "should be egalitarian"?

Alternatives include "ought to be equitable", "must be fair", or "needs to be impartial", each emphasizing different aspects of fairness and equality.

In what situations is it appropriate to use "should be egalitarian"?

It's appropriate when discussing principles, policies, or systems where equality and fairness are paramount. Examples include discussions about justice, human rights, and resource distribution.

What's the nuance between "should be egalitarian" and "should be equal"?

"Should be egalitarian" emphasizes fairness in process and distribution, ensuring everyone has equal opportunities. "Should be equal" focuses more on identical outcomes or status, which may not always be feasible or desirable.