Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(11)
Comparable to a classical randomized controlled study, a new technology should always be compared to another existing technology.
Model results should always be compared with market reality.
Climate projections should always be compared with the 20C simulation of the respective models and not with observed data.
The cost-benefit of the procedure should always be compared to other approaches involving lower morbidity rates.
Second, PN data should always be compared in total, but not as subcategories of clinically defined and microbiologically defined PN.
Therefore, clinical findings on the components of hypertonia assessed in an analytical manner should always be compared to measurements of activity and function.
Similar(49)
(187) For a specific meat product the benefits of using a controlled packaging atmosphere should accordingly always be compared to any other effects introduced in relation to product quality.
A subgroup analysis should always be performed comparing the effects of trials with 'low risk of bias' to trials with 'high risk of bias'.
Thus, in order to avoid missing critical information, VR images should always be correlated and compared with corresponding MPR images.
Therefore, measuring the error of the studied techniques should always be performed when comparing two methods.
Caution should always be used when comparing results across different studies, as different PCR techniques may be employed at different facilities.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com