Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
she was apyrexial
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "she was apyrexial" is correct and usable in written English, though it is quite technical.
It can be used in medical contexts to describe a person who does not have a fever or elevated body temperature. Example: "After a thorough examination, the doctor confirmed that she was apyrexial, indicating no signs of infection."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Alternative expressions(20)
she was afebrile
she was instrumental
she was patient
she was friendly
she was restless
she was welcome
she was radiant
she was off
she was asymptomatic
she was away
she was absent
she was febrile
she was conscious
she was out
she was premenarchal
she did not attend
she was unable
she was furious
she was not present
she was unavailable
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
3 human-written examples
On examination, she was apyrexial, normotensive and normoglycaemic with a Glasgow Coma Scale of 15/15.
She was apyrexial.
Science
She was apyrexial and had no rash, photophobia, neck stiffness or stigmata of endocarditis.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
The vital signs were normal, and he was apyrexial.
Systemic examination was normal and he was apyrexial.
On examination he was apyrexial and orientated.
Science
Otherwise, the patient was apyrexial and there was no erythema, purulent discharge or raised temperature in the skin.
Science
He was admitted the following day, rehydrated with intravenous fluids and within 24 h was apyrexial after tazocin and gentamicin.
Science
On admission, the patient was apyrexial, pale, dyspnoeic at rest, with a blood pressure of 113/88 mmHg, a palpable pulsus paradoxus and pulse rate 122 beats per minute.
Science
On examination he was apyrexial, blood pressure 135/69 mmHg, an indeterminate jugular venous pressure (due to numerous previous central venous dialysis catheters), normal heart and chest sounds.
Science
He was apyrexial and his white cell count was within the normal range but his CRP was raised to 11 (normal Value <9).
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
In medical documentation, using "she was apyrexial" provides a clear and concise statement about the absence of fever, ensuring accurate record-keeping. It's more precise than saying "she was fine".
Common error
Avoid using "she was apyrexial" in everyday conversations or informal writing. Simpler phrases like "she had no fever" or "she wasn't running a temperature" are more appropriate for general audiences.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "she was apyrexial" functions as a descriptive statement in medical contexts. Ludwig confirms its usage to indicate the absence of fever in a patient. The examples show it commonly appears during patient examinations or when reporting vital signs.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "she was apyrexial" is a grammatically correct and usable term in English, primarily employed in medical contexts to denote the absence of fever. As highlighted by Ludwig, it serves as a concise way to document a patient's condition, especially in medical reports and clinical discussions. While accurate, its formal nature makes it less suitable for everyday conversation, where alternatives like "she had no fever" are preferred. Ludwig provides examples demonstrating its common usage in scientific publications.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
she had no fever
This is a simpler, more common way to express the same idea, suitable for general audiences.
she was afebrile
This is a direct synonym, maintaining the clinical register but using a different term.
her temperature was normal
This focuses on the measurement rather than the absence of fever, implying a reading within acceptable range.
she presented without fever
This emphasizes the initial assessment of the patient's condition upon examination.
she did not exhibit fever
This is a more formal way of saying she showed no signs of fever.
fever was absent
This is a concise way of stating that fever was not present, suitable for medical notes.
no fever was detected
This highlights the process of checking for fever and finding none.
she maintained a normal body temperature
This emphasizes the stability of her temperature within a normal range.
her pyrexia was absent
This utilizes the term "pyrexia" (fever) to state its absence, maintaining the clinical context.
she wasn't running a temperature
This is an informal way to say she did not have a fever.
FAQs
What does it mean when a patient is described as "she was apyrexial"?
It means the patient did not have a fever, indicating the absence of elevated body temperature, which is often a sign of infection or illness.
Is it better to say "she was apyrexial" or "she had no fever"?
While both phrases convey the same meaning, "she was apyrexial" is more formal and typically used in medical settings. "She had no fever" is more common in general conversation.
What is a more common alternative to saying "she was apyrexial" in a medical report?
A more common alternative in medical reports is "she was afebrile", which is a direct synonym. Both terms are understood within the medical community.
In what situations is it appropriate to use the term "she was apyrexial"?
The term "she was apyrexial" is most appropriate in medical contexts, such as patient charts, medical reports, and discussions among healthcare professionals.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested